Classical swine fever virus marker vaccine strain CP7_E2alf: Shedding and dissemination studies in boars
Introduction
Classical swine fever (CSF) remains one of the major threats for profitable pig production worldwide, and due to its impact, it is notifiable to the OIE [1]. In most industrialized pig production systems, prophylactic vaccination against the viral disease is banned and outbreaks are controlled through strict and legal binding hygiene measures (see e.g. European Union Council Directive 2001/89/EC and Commission Decision 2002/106/EC). In densely populated livestock areas and in larger outbreak scenarios, this policy can lead to tremendous numbers of animals that have to be culled in restriction zones. To avoid this, emergency vaccination could be implemented as laid down in the above-mentioned legislation. However, the option of emergency vaccination is hampered by limitations in the available subunit marker vaccines, and trade restrictions that are imposed on conventionally vaccinated animals [2]. To overcome these problems, research activities were directed towards the development of new generations of marker vaccines [3]. Over the last decade, several approaches have been followed and tested, among them chimeric pestiviruses such as “CP7_E2alf” [4], [5], [6], [7], [8].
After its first description as possible marker vaccine candidate against CSF in 2004 [4], “CP7_E2alf” was evaluated in the framework of two EU funded research projects and beyond. The chimaera with a cytopathogenic BVDV “CP7” backbone and the glycoprotein E2 of CSFV “Alfort 187” has proven safety for target and non-target species as well as against different challenge virus strains. Furthermore, genetic and serological DIVA concepts were established [9], [10], [11].
Given the fact that the vaccine is a genetically engineered virus, assessment of all safety aspects is crucial for field applications and the evaluation towards licensing. In this respect, one of the outstanding issues was the question whether vaccine virus could be found in semen of vaccinated boars. Moreover, absence of shedding in faeces and urine still had to be demonstrated. These issues are going far beyond the standard requirements of the European Pharmacopoeia and were thus only done upon completion of the routine studies.
Here, a trial was conducted under controlled laboratory conditions with 12 boars.
As substitute for semen, all genitals and accessory sex glands were tested for vaccine virus. In addition, lymphatic and parenchymatous organs as well as a range of additional sample matrices including saliva, bile, and bone marrow, were screened for vaccine virus in order to provide additional data on distribution and primary replication sites.
Section snippets
Study design
The study comprised 12 cross-bred boars aged 6–7 months. All animals were purchased from a commercial boar fattening farm and brought to the high containment facilities at the Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany. Upon arrival, the animals were randomly assigned to two stables/treatment groups (G1 and G2). All applicable animal welfare regulations, including EU Directive 2010/63/EC and institutional guidelines, were taken into consideration. The animal experiment was
Clinical and pathological observations
Upon vaccination, neither local nor systemic adverse effects could be observed in vaccinated animals. Necropsy was without any special findings apart from an abscessating Ln. parotideus in one animal (OM9 at 7 dpv). However, pathohistological investigations indicated that this lesion was most likely unrelated to vaccination. The well-organized abscess capsule spoke for a chronic lesion much older than seven days.
Viraemia (detection of viral genome in EDTA blood)
Viral RNA was only detected in EDTA blood samples from three out of six animals
Conclusions
The complete lack of “CP7_E2alf” detection in all male genitals and accessory sex glands indicates a negligible risk of vaccine virus shedding and transmission through semen. Thus, safety for reproductive boars is confirmed. However, for emergency vaccination scenarios, a risk-benefit analysis should be carried out with regard to vaccination of breeding animals in general.
In addition, shedding through urine, faeces, and saliva, and thus contamination of the environment with vaccine virus, did
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Ulrike Kleinert, Holger Scholten, Kristin Trippler, and Laura Zoch their excellent laboratory work. Additionally, the author's would like to acknowledge all animal caretakers and technical staff involved in this study. The research project leading to these results has received funding through the vaccine manufacturer, Zoetis.
Conflict of interest: Apart from the above-mentioned funding, no conflicts of interest exist.
References (15)
- et al.
Classical swine fever: the global situation
Vet Microbiol
(2000) - et al.
Novel marker vaccines against classical swine fever
Vaccine
(2007) - et al.
An avirulent chimeric Pestivirus with altered cell tropism protects pigs against lethal infection with classical swine fever virus
Virology
(2004) - et al.
Chimeric (marker) C-strain viruses induce clinical protection against virulent classical swine fever virus (CSFV) and reduce transmission of CSFV between vaccinated pigs
Vaccine
(2001) - et al.
Characterization of a new chimeric marker vaccine candidate with a mutated antigenic E2-epitope
Vet Microbiol
(2010) - et al.
Chimeric classical swine fever viruses containing envelope protein E(RNS) or E2 of bovine viral diarrhoea virus protect pigs against challenge with CSFV and induce a distinguishable antibody response
Vaccine
(2000) - et al.
Efficacy of marker vaccine candidate CP7_E2alf against challenge with classical swine fever virus isolates of different genotypes
Vet Microbiol
(2014)