Skip to main content
Log in

Toward modeling reading comprehension and reading fluency in English language learners

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated the adequacy of an expanded simple view of reading (SVR) framework for English language learners (ELLs), using mediation modeling approach. The proposed expanded SVR included reading fluency as an outcome and phonological awareness and naming speed as predictors. To test the fit of the proposed mediation model, longitudinal data from 308 ELLs from different linguistic backgrounds were analyzed using structural equation modeling. We examined the mediating role of Grade 2 word-level reading skills in the association between Grade 1 phonological awareness, naming speed, and listening comprehension and Grade 3 reading comprehension and reading fluency. The results indicated that word-level reading skills fully mediated the association between phonological awareness, reading comprehension and reading fluency. Word-level reading skills partially mediated the association between naming speed and reading fluency. Listening comprehension contributed directly to reading comprehension and reading fluency. It appears that reading development in ELLs is better understood when reading fluency is added to the SVR framework as an outcome and naming speed as a building block of SVR. Theoretical aspects of the mediation model in relation to ELL reading development are also addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Note that when data collection commenced, commercial, standardized measures of phonological processing, such as the CTOPP, were not yet available.

References

  • Adlof, S. M., Catts, H. W., & Little, T. D. (2006). Should the simple view of reading include a fluency component? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 19, 933–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison, P. D. (2003). Missing data techniques for structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 545–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • August, D., & Shanahan, T. (2006). Introduction and methodology. In D. August & T. Shanahan (Eds.), Developing literacy in second language learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on Language-Minority Children and Youth (pp. 1–42). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bashir, A. S., & Hook, P. E. (2009). Fluency: A key link between word identification and comprehension. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 40, 196–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Trivedi, P., Olson, E., Gould, L., Hiramatsu, S., et al. (2010). Applying the multiple dimensions of reading fluency to assessment and instruction. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 28, 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biemiller, A. J. (1981). Biemiller test of reading processes. Toronto, ON, Canada: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biemiller, A. (1999). Language and reading success. Cambridge, MA: Brookline.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, P. G. (1995). Tracing symbol naming speed’s unique contribution to reading disability over time. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 7, 189–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, P. G., Golden, J., Kennedy, A., & Young, A. (1994). Limits upon orthographic knowledge due to processes index by naming speed. In V. W. Berninger (Ed.), The varieties of orthographic knowledge: Vol. 1. Theoretical and developmental issues (pp. 173–218). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buly, M. R., & Valencia, S. W. (2002). Below the bar: Profiles of students who fail state reading assessments. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 219–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cain, K., Oakhill, J. V., & Bryant, P. (2000). Phonological skills and comprehension failure: A test of the phonological processing deficit hypothesis. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13, 31–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cain, K., Oakhill, J. V., & Bryant, P. (2004). Children’s reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 31–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. F., Beeman, M., Davis, H. L., & Spharim, G. (1999). Relationship of metalinguistic capabilities and reading achievement for children who are becoming bilingual. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20, 459–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, R. P., & David, A. H. (2001). Investigating reading achievement using a causal model. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 107–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catts, H. W., Fey, M. E., Zhang, X., & Tomblin, B. (1999). Language basis of reading and reading disabilities: Evidence from a longitudinal investigation. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 331–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chall, J. S. (1983). Stages of reading development. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiappe, P., Siegel, L. S., & Wade-Woolley, L. (2002). Linguistic diversity and the development of reading skills: A longitudinal study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 369–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen-Mimran, R. (2009). The contribution of language skills to reading fluency: A comparison of two orthographies for Hebrew. Journal of Child Language, 36, 657–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D. A. (1987). Utility of confirmatory factor analysis in test validation research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 584–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, W. M., & Levy, B. A. (2008). Developing fluent text procession with practice: Memorial influences on fluency and comprehension. Canadian Psychology, 49, 133–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, L. M., Schafer, J. L., & Kam, C. M. (2001). A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures. Psychological Methods, 6, 330–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colón, E. P., & Kranzler, J. H. (2006). Effect of instructions on curriculum-based measurement of reading. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 24, 318–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosson, A. C., & Lesaux, N. K. (2010). Revisiting assumptions about the relationship of fluent reading to comprehension: Spanish-speakers’ text-reading fluency in English. Reading and Writing, An Interdisciplinary Journal, 23, 475–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutting, L. E., Materek, A., Cole, C. A. S., Levine, T. M., & Mahone, E. M. (2009). Effects of fluency, oral language and executive function on reading comprehension performance. Annals of Dyslexia, 59, 34–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutting, L. E., & Scarborough, H. S. (2006). Prediction of reading comprehension: Relative contributions of word recognition, language proficiency, and other cognitive skills can depend on how comprehension is measured. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 277–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denckla, M. B., & Rudel, R. G. (1976). Rapid automatized naming (R.A.N.): Dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilities. Neuropsychologia, 14, 471–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Droop, M., & Verhoeven, L. (2003). Language proficiency and reading ability in first- and second-language learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 38, 78–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durrell, D. D. (1970). Durrell analysis of reading difficulty. New York: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M., Stuebing, K. K., Lyon, G. R., Shaywitz, B. A., & Shaywitz, S. E. (2005). Psychometric approaches to the identification of LD: IQ and achievement scores are not sufficient. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 98–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geva, E. (2006). Second-language oral proficiency and second-language literacy. In D. August & T. Shanahan (Eds.), Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on Language-Minority Children and Youth (pp. 123–139). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geva, E., & Yaghoub Zadeh, Z. (2006). Reading efficiency in native English-speaking and English-as-a-second-language children: The role of oral proficiency and underlying cognitive-linguistic processes. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 31–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottardo, A., & Mueller, J. (2009). Are first and second language factors related in predicting school language reading comprehension? A study of Spanish-speaking children acquiring English as a second language from first to second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 330–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. RASE: Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2, 127–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J. R., Fuchs, L. S., van den Broek, P., Espin, C., & Deno, S. L. (2003). Sources of individual differences in reading comprehension and reading fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 719–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, T. C., & Kirby, J. R. (2006). The contribution of naming speed to the simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 19, 339–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Serböm, D. (2001). LISREL 8: User’s reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, R. M., & Aaron, P. G. (2000). The component model of reading: Simple view of reading made a little more complex. Reading Psychology, 21, 85–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katzir, T., Kim, Y., Wolf, M., O’Brien, B., Kennedy, B., Lovett, M., et al. (2006). Reading fluency: The whole is more than the parts. Annals of Dyslexia, 56, 51–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, J. R., & Savage, R. S. (2008). Can the simple view deal with the complexities of reading? Literacy, 42, 75–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesaux, N. K., Lipka, O., & Siegel, L. S. (2006). Investigating cognitive and linguistic abilities that influence the reading comprehension skills of children from diverse linguistic backgrounds. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 19, 99–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesaux, N. K., Rupp, A. A., & Siegel, L. S. (2007). Growth in reading skills of children from diverse linguistic backgrounds: Findings from a five-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 821–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manis, F. R., Seidenberg, M. S., & Doi, L. M. (1999). See Dick RAN: Rapid naming and the longitudinal prediction of reading subskills in first and second graders. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 129–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, S. E., & Cole, D. A. (2007). Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation. Psychological Methods, 12, 23–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBride-Chang, C., Wagner, R. K., & Chang, L. (1997). Growth modeling of phonological awareness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 621–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merbaum, C., & Geva, E. (1998, December). The relationship between listening and reading comprehension in L1 and L2 Grade one children. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference (“The role of oral language proficiency in the development of English as a second language reading skills of young children”), Austin, TX.

  • Meyer, M. S., & Felton, R. H. (1999). Repeated reading to enhance fluency: Old approaches and new directions. Annals of Dyslexia, 49, 283–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. F., Heilmann, J., Nockerts, A., Iglesias, A., Fabiano, L., & Francis, D. J. (2006). Oral language and reading in bilingual children. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 21, 30–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamoto, J., Lindsey, K. A., & Manis, F. R. (2008). A cross-linguistic investigation of English language learners’ reading comprehension in English and Spanish. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12, 351–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parrila, R. K., Kirby, J. R., & McQuarrie, L. (2004). Articulation rate, naming speed, verbal short-term memory, and phonological awareness: Longitudinal predictors of early reading development. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8, 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennington, B. F., Cardoso-Martins, C., Green, P. A., & Lefly, D. L. (2001). Comparing the phonological and double deficit hypotheses for developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 707–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. “What should the scientific study of reading be now and in the near future?” [special issue]. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 357–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, C. P., Carlo, M., August, D., & Snow, C. (2005). Native Spanish-speaking children reading in English: Toward a model of comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 247–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puranik, C. S., Petscher, Y., Al Otaiba, S., Catts, H. W., & Lonigan, C. J. (2008). Development of oral reading fluency in children with speech or language impairments. A growth curve analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 545–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riedel, B. W. (2007). The relation between DIBELS, reading comprehension, and vocabulary in urban first-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 42, 546–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosner, J., & Simon, D. P. (1971). The auditory analysis test: An initial report. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 4, 383–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, J., & Graham, J. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slocum, T. A., Street, E. M., & Gilberts, G. (1995). A review of research and theory on the relation between oral reading rate and reading comprehension. Journal of Behavioral Education, 5, 377–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, R., & Ganschow, L. (2001). Aptitude for learning a foreign language. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 90–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1989). Exposure to print and orthographic processing. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 402–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torgesen, J., Rashotte, C., & Alexander, A. (2001). The prevention and remediation of reading fluency problems. In M. Wolf (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency, and the brain (pp. 333–355). Cambridge, MA: York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Burgess, S., & Hecht, S. (1997). Contributions of phonological awareness and rapid automatic naming ability to the growth of word-reading skills in second- to fifth-grade children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 161–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Gelderen, A., Schoonen, R., de Glopper, K., & Hulstijn, J. (2007). Development of adolescent reading comprehension in language 1 and language 2: A longitudinal analysis of constituent components. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 477–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Gelderen, A., Schoonen, R., de Glopper, K., Hulstijn, J., Simis, A., Snellings, P., et al. (2004). Linguistic knowledge, processing speed and metacognitive knowledge in first and second language reading comprehension: A componential analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 19–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhoeven, L. (2000). Components in early second language reading and spelling. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4, 313–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vukovic, R. K., & Siegel, L. S. (2006). The double deficit hypothesis: A comprehensive review of the evidence. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 25–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A., Hecht, S. A., Barker, T. A., Burgess, S. R., et al. (1997). Changing relations between phonological abilities and word-level reading as children develop from beginning to skilled readers: A five-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 33, 468–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, H. I., & Deno, S. L. (2005). Oral reading and maze measures as predictors of success for English learners on a state standards assessment. Remedial and Special Education, 26, 207–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, G. S. (1993). Wide range achievement test–Revised (WRAT 3-R) (3rd ed.). Wilmington, DE: Wide Range.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M., & Katzir-Cohen, T. (2001). Reading fluency and its intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 211–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M., Pfeil, C., Lotz, R., & Biddle, K. (1994). Toward a more universal understanding of the developmental dyslexias: The contribution of orthographic factors. In V. W. Berninger (Ed.), The varieties of orthographic knowledge: Vol. 1. Theoretical and developmental issues (pp. 137–171). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. E. (2009). Modeling the relationships between cognitive and reading measures in third and fourth grade children. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 27, 96–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R. W. (1987). Woodcock reading mastery test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zohreh Yaghoub Zadeh.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 2.

Table 2 Means, standard deviations, F-value, and p-value for missing group and the group with complete data

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yaghoub Zadeh, Z., Farnia, F. & Geva, E. Toward modeling reading comprehension and reading fluency in English language learners. Read Writ 25, 163–187 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9252-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9252-0

Keywords

Navigation