Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Canceling Last Minute in Italian and Colombian Spanish: A Cross-Cultural Account of Pragmalinguistic Strategies

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Corpus Pragmatics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study is part of a larger research project aiming to gather and compare last-minute cancellations in different languages. The corpus, collected through an online DCT, is being annotated with NVivo software according to a set of pragmatic categories. These are derived from previous cross-cultural studies (Blum-Kulka et al. in Cross-cultural pragmatics: requests and apologies, Ablex, Norwood, 1989; Beebe et al. in Developing communicative competence in a second language, Newbury House, New York, 1990) and integrated with new ones identified in the corpus, following a data-driven approach. Declining an invitation poses a threat to the invitee’s positive face, because it shows noncompliance with the inviter’s desire to share time and friendship with the invitee. A last-minute cancellation is potentially threatening for negative face, as it interferes with the inviter’s plans, but it may save positive face because the invitee attributes her/his absence to an unforeseen and unavoidable circumstance. Little research has been devoted to both Italian and Colombian Spanish from a cross-cultural pragmatic perspective, whereas other varieties of Spanish have received more attention in this regard (see García and Placencia 2007). The present study aims to fill this gap by exploring the pragmalinguistic strategies Italians and Colombians consider appropriate to use when canceling last minute. Frequency and distribution of speech act components and internal modifiers were compared between Colombian and Italian native speakers’ last-minute cancellations (n = 753). The significance of the observed differences was assessed by Chi squared test. Results show interesting differences at the pragmalinguistic level, suggesting that Italians prefer more complex and mitigated last-minute cancellations in comparison to Colombians.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The two languages object of this study were chosen, because both authors investigate in the field of Italian as a second language, and one of them is a bilingual of these two languages.

  2. For the present study only a part of the Italian data used in Cortés Velásquez (2017) was selected, so that the datasets of the two populations are more comparable in terms of total amount and geographical distribution of the informants.

  3. The DCT has been slightly modified for the new data collection in progress (cf. Sec. 5), so that respondents are asked to write what they think they would say in a text message, instead of imagining they are in a phone call with the inviter.

  4. A specialized software for qualitative data analysis.

  5. For further examples of the categories the reader is referred to Cortés Velásquez and Nuzzo (Forthcoming).

  6. The examples taken from the corpus are reported exactly as typed by the respondents. English translations were kept as literal as possible.

  7. In the Colombian variety of Spanish this expression has the illocutionary force of an apology, whereas in other varieties it is used with the meaning of ‘it’s a sin’.

References

  • Achiba, A. (2003). Learning to request in a second language. A study of child interlanguage pragmatics. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters LTD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albor, H. R. (1973). “Da” + gerundio, ¿un quechuismo? Y otras maneras de atenuar los imperativos. Hispania,56, 316–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alfonzetti, G. (2009). I complimenti nella conversazione. Rome: Editori Riuniti University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alfonzetti, G. (2013). I complimenti in Italiano. Riflessioni metapragmatiche. In E. Casanova & C. Calvo (Eds.), Actes du XXVIe Congrès International de Linguistique et Philologie Romanes, Valencia 6–11 sett. 2010 (Vol. V, pp. 343–352), Tübingen, Niemeyer.

  • Al-Kahtani, S. A. L. (2005). Refusals realizations in three different cultures: A speech act theoretically-based cross cultural study. Language & Translation,18, 35–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allami, H., & Amin, N. (2011). A cross-linguistic study of refusals: An analysis of pragmatic competence development in Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Pragmatics: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language Studies,43(1), 385–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aston, G. (Ed.). (1988). Negotiating service: Studies in the discourse of book shop encounters. Bologna: CLUEB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, A. (2003). Acquisition in interlanguage pragmatics. Learning how to do things with words in a study abroad context. Benjamins: Amsterdam-Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beebe, L., Takahashi, T., & Uliss-Weltz, R. (1990). Pragmatic transfer in ESL refusals. In R. Scarcella, E. Andersen, & S. Krashen (Eds.), Developing communicative competence in a second language (pp. 50–73). New York: Newbury House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettoni, C., & Rubino, A. (2007). Reacting to complaints: Italians vs Anglo-Australians. Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica e Applicata,3, 483–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (Eds.). (1989). Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Norwood: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bravo, D. (2004). Tensión entre universalidad y relatividad en las teorías de la cortesía. In D. Bravo & A. Briz (Eds.), Pragmática sociocultural: Estudios sobre el discurso de cortesía en español (pp. 15–37). Barcelona: Ariel Lingüística.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodine, R. (1991). Requesting and responding in Italian and English service encounters. In E. Weigand & F. Hundsnurscher (Eds.), Dialoganalyse III: Referate der 3. Arebitstagung Bologna 1990. Vol. I (Beiträge zur Dialogforschung 1) (pp. 293–305). Tübingen: Niemeyer.

  • Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness. Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Businaro, B. (2002). Lo scusarsi tra convenzione e conversazione. Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica e Applicata,31, 471–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bustamante López, I., & Niño Murcia, M. (1995). Impositive speech acts in northern Andean Spanish: A pragmatic description. Hispania,78(4), 885–897.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caicedo, M. H. (1992). Dialecto y sociedad en Buenaventura. Revista Lenguaje,19(20), 55–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castagneto, M. (2016). Le risposte ai complimenti in Italia: questioni di gender (pp. 169–179). IX: Atti del Sodalizio Glottologico Milanese.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castagneto, M., & Ravetto, M. (2015). The variability of compliment responses: Italian and German data. In S. Gesuato, F. Bianchi, & W. Cheng (Eds.), Teaching, learning and investigating pragmatics: Principles, methods and practices (pp. 387–413). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castellano Ascencio, M. D. (2017). Análisis pragmático de la función de los tratamientos nominales en actos de habla descorteses en Medellín (Colombia). Forma y Función,30(2), 141–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y.-F. (2009). How to say no: An analysis of cross-cultural difference and pragmatic transfer. Language Sciences,31(4), 477–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colamussi, A., & Pallotti, G. (2003). Le aperture di telefonate in italiano e spagnolo. In E. M. Thüne & S. Leonardi (Eds.), Telefonare in diverse lingue (pp. 91–111). Milan: F. Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortés Velásquez, D. (2017). Rechazar una invitación: estudio transcultural de estrategias pragmáticas de italianos y colombianos. E-JournALL,4(2), 115–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortés Velásquez, D., & Nuzzo, E. (2017). Disdire un appuntamento: spunti per la didattica dell’italiano L2 a partire da un corpus di parlanti nativi. Italiano LinguaDue,1, 17–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortés Velásquez, D., & Nuzzo, E. (2018). Un’indagine sulla consapevolezza metapragmatica di parlanti plurilingui. In A. De Meo & M. Rasulo (Eds.), Usare le lingue seconde. Comunicazione, tecnologia, disabilità, insegnamento (pp. 99–111). Milano: Associazione Italiana di Linguistica Applicata.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortés Velásquez, D., & Nuzzo, E. (forthcoming). Il progetto DISDIR: orifine, sviluppo e direzioni di ricerca. In E. Santoro, L. A. da Silva, & M. Z. Moriondo Kulikowski (Eds.), Atos de fala em perspectiva cross-cultural.

  • Cyluk, A. (2013). Discourse completion task: Its validity and reliability in research projects on speech acts. Anglica: An International Journal of English Studies,22(2), 101–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado, V. (1995). Politeness in language: Directive speech acts in Colombian and Castilian Spanish, and U.S. English. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY.

  • Escamilla Morales, J., Morales Escorcia, E., Torres Roncallo, L. M., & Vega, G. (2004). La cortesía verbal y gestual en la ciudad de Barranquilla (Colombia). In D. Bravo & A. Briz (Eds.), Pragmática sociocultural: Estudios sobre el discurso de cortesía en español (pp. 197–210). Barcelona: Ariel Lingüística.

    Google Scholar 

  • Félix-Brasdefer, J. C. (2003). Declining an invitation: A cross-cultural study of pragmatic strategies in American English and Latin American Spanish. Multilingua: Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication,22(3), 225–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Félix-Brasdefer, J. C. (2007). Politeness in Mexico and the United States: A contrastive study of the realization and perception of refusals. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Félix-Brasdefer, J. C. (2010). Data collection methods in speech act performance: DCTs, role plays, and verbal reports. In A. Martínez-Flor & E. Usó-Juan (Eds.), Speech act performance: Theoretical, empirical and methodological issues (pp. 41–56). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitch, K. (2008). Variación pragmática en los actos de habla de colombianos urbanos: Creando y manteniendo las clases sociales. Montevideo, Uruguay. Resource document. Asociación de Lingüística y Filología de America Latina (ALFAL). http://ir.uiowa.edu/commstud_pubs/18. Retrieved on Mar 15, 2019.

  • Fitch, K. L. (1990/1991). A ritual for attempting leave-taking in Colombia. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 24, 209–224.

  • Fitch, K. L. (1991). The interplay of linguistic universals and cultural knowledge in personal address: Colombian madre terms. Communication Monographs,58, 254–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitch, K. L. (1993). “¡Oye mamacita!”: Uso de los términos del campo semántico madre en la comunicación diaria en el español de Colombia. Revista de Estudios Colombianos,13(14), 25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitch, K. L. (1994). A cross-cultural study of directive sequences and some implications for compliance-gaining research. Communication Monographs,61, 185–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitch, K. L. (2007). Two politeness dilemmas in Colombian. In M. E. Placencia & C. García (Eds.), Research on politeness in the Spanish speaking world (pp. 245–259). London: Lawrence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitch, K. L., & Sanders, R. (1994). Culture, communication, and preferences for directness in expression of directives. Communication Theory,4, 219–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flórez, L. (1975). Del español hablado en Colombia. Seis muestras de léxico. Bogotá: Instituto Caro y Cuervo.

    Google Scholar 

  • García, C., & Placencia, M. E. (Eds.) (2007). Research on politeness in the Spanish-Speaking world. Mahwah NJ – London: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Gass, S. M., & Houck, N. (1999). Interlanguage refusals: A cross-cultural study of Japanese-English. Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavioli, L., & Mansfield, G. (Eds.). (1990). The PIXI corpus: Bookshop encounters in English and Italian. Bologna: CLUEB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghazanfari, M., Bonyadi, A., & Malekzadeh, S. (2013). Investigating cross-linguistic differences in refusal speech act among native Persian and English speakers. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning,2(4), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrsll.2012.214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez, T. (2009). A sociopragmatic analysis of apology as a speech act in Colombian. Segundas Lenguas e Inmigración en red,2, 38–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greet Cotton, E., & Sharp, J. M. (1988). Spanish in the Americas. Washington: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, Y. (2012). Chinese and American refusal strategy: A cross-cultural approach. Theory and Practice in Language Studies,2(2), 247–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, X. (2006). Cross-cultural pragmatic differences in US and Chinese Press conferences: The case of the North Korea nuclear crisis. Discourse & Society: An International Journal for the Study of Discourse and Communication in Their Social, Political and Cultural Contexts,17(2), 237–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kany, E. (1951). American-Spanish syntax (2nd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kecskes, I. (2017). Cross-cultural and intercultural pragmatics. In Yan Huang (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of pragmatics (pp. 78–92). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, J. (2004). Expressing refusals in Korean and in American English. Multilingua: Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication,23(4), 339–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Méndez Vallejo, C. (2013). Conversational and prosodic patterns in Spanish requests. International Journal of Language Studies,7(2), 109–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Méndez Vallejo, C. (2014). The M word: Face and politeness in Colombian Spanish. Dialectología,12, 89–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monzoni, C., & Zorzi, D. (2003). Le telefonate d’emergenza: un confronto fra l’italiano e l’inglese. In E. M. Thüne & S. Leonardi (Eds.), Telefonare in diverse lingue (pp. 163–181). Milan: F. Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, G. L., Carson, J., Al Batal, M., & El Bakary, W. (2002). Cross-cultural pragmatics: Strategy use in Egyptian Arabic and American English refusals. Applied Linguistics,23(2), 163–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niño Murcia, M. (1992). El futuro sintético en el español andino: Caso de mandato atenuado. Hispania,75, 705–713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuzzo, E. (2007). Imparare a fare cose con le parole. Richieste, proteste, scuse in italiano lingua seconda. Perugia: Guerra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuzzo, E. (2009). “Buongiorno, ho bisogno dell’informazione per andare a Barcellona”. Uno studio longitudinale sulle richieste di informazioni e suggerimenti in italiano L2. Linguistica e Filologia,28, 83–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuzzo, E. (2019). “Dai fallo per me!” L’insistenza di fronte a un rifiuto: evidenze empiriche per la didattica dell’italiano a stranieri. Cuadernos de Filología Italiana,26, 75–91. https://doi.org/10.5209/cfit.61495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuzzo, E., & Santoro, E. (2017). Apprendimento, insegnamento e uso di competenze pragmatiche in italiano L2/LS: la ricerca a partire dagli anni Duemila. Euro-American Journal of Applied Linguistics and Languages,4(2), 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogiermann, E. (2018). Discourse completion task. In A. H. Jucker, K. P. Schneider, & W. Bublitz (Eds.), Methods in pragmatics (pp. 229–255). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallotti, G., & Varcasia, C. (2008). Service telephone call openings: A comparative study on five European languages. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 16, 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, S. (2013). Compliment responses of female German and Italian university students: A contrastive study. Language Studies Working Papers,5, 22–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Placencia, M. E. (2007). Studies in politeness in Colombian, Ecuadorian, and Peruvian Spanish. In M. E. Placencia & C. García (Eds.), Research on politeness in the Spanish-speaking world (pp. 59–89). Mirwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravetto, M. (2012). Le risposte al complimento in italiano e in tedesco. Analisi di corpora di parlato. Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica e Applicata,1, 85–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rey, A. (1994). The usage of usted in three societies: Colombia, Honduras, and Nicaragua. Language Quarterly,32, 193–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocha, B. N. R. M., Cobra Torre, M., & Mello, H. (2015). Estratégias de cortesia no ato de fala da recusa a pedidos: uma investigação do português brasileiro e do italiano. Revista de Italianística,30, 61–79. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2238-8281.v0i30p61-79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubino, A., & Bettoni, C. (2006). Handling complaints cross-culturally: Italians vs Anglo-Australians. Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica e Applicata,35(2), 339–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz Morales, H. (1987). Desplazamiento semántico en las formas de tratamiento del español de Colombia. In H. López, & M. Vaquero (Eds.), Actas del I Congreso Internacional sobre el Español de América. San Juan, Puerto Rico, Octubre 1982 (pp. 765–775). Puerto Rico: Academia Puertorriqueña de la Lengua Española.

  • Ruiz de Zarobe, L., & Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. (Eds.). (2012). Speech acts and politeness across languages and cultures. Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahragard, R., & Javanmardi, F. (2011). English speech act realization of “refusals” among Iranian EFL learners/La realisation des actes de discours de “refus” en anglais parmi les apprenants ALE Iraniens. Cross-Cultural Communication,7(2), 181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santoro, E. (2017). Richieste e attenuazione: un confronto tra italiano e portoghese brasiliano. Normas,7(2), 179–204. https://doi.org/10.7203/normas.v7i2.11173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, K. P., & Barron, A. (2008). Variational PRAGMATICS: A focus on regional varieties in pluricentric languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, K. P., & Placencia, M. E. (2017). (Im)politeness and regional variation. In J. Culpeper, M. Haugh, & D. K. Kádár (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of linguistic (im)politeness (pp. 539–570). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R. (1977). A classification of illocutionary acts. In A. Rogers, B. Wall, & J. Murphy (Eds.), Proceedings of the Texas conference on performatives, presupposition, and implicatures (pp. 27–45). Washington: Center for Applied Linguistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatsuki, D., & Fujimoto, D. (2016). Back to the basics: Filling the gaps in pragmatics teaching materials. Tokyo: Japan Association for Language Teaching Pragmatics Special Interest Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thüne, E.-M., & Leonardi, S. (Eds.). (2003). Telefonare in diverse lingue. Milan: F. Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trosborg, A. (1995). Interlanguage pragmatics. Requests, complaints and apologies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trosborg, A. (Ed.). (2010). Pragmatics across languages and cultures. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trubnikova, V. (2018). La pragmatica dell’italiano L2: analisi teorica e modelli operativi per apprendenti russofoni. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Università degli Studi di Padova.

  • Uber, D. R. (1984). The pronouns of address in the Spanish of Bogotá, Colombia. The SECOL Review,8, 9–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uber, D. R. (1985). The dual function of usted. Forms of address in Bogotá, Colombia. Hispania,68, 388–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uber, D. R. (1997). The pronouns of address used in business Spanish in five Latin American cities: A quantitative analysis. In C. J. Paolini (Ed.), La Chispa’97 selected proceedings (pp. 383–394). New Orleans, LA: The Eighteenth Louisiana Conference on Hispanic Languages and Literatures, Tulane University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uber, D. R. (1999a). Forms of address in the commercial Spanish of Five Latin American cities. In J. G. Gutiérrez-Rexach & F. Martínez-Gil (Eds.), Advances in Hispanic linguistics: Papers from the 2nd Hispanic linguistics Symposium (pp. 110–118). Somerville: Cascadilla Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uber, D. R. (1999b). Fórmulas de tratamiento en el español comercial de cinco ciudades hispanoamericanas. In J. A. Samper (Ed.), Actas del XI Congreso Internacional de la Asociación de Lingüística y Filología de la América Lagina (ALFAL) (Vol. 1, pp. 829–838). Las Palmas de Gran Canaria: Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria y Libería Nogal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varcasia, C. (2003). Chiamate di servizio in Italia e Germania: aperture a confronto. In E. M. Thüne & S. Leonardi (Eds.), Telefonare in diverse lingue (pp. 112–132). Milan: F. Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varcasia, C. (2013). Business and service telephone conversations. An investigation of British English, German and Italian encounters. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vélez Trujillo, V. E. (2011). Sociopragmatic study of politeness in speech acts. Congratulating in Colombian Spanish. Unpublished Master’s Dissertation, Arizona State University.

  • Venuti, I. (2013). A comparison of the realization of requestive speech acts in Italian and German. Unpublished BA dissertation, Università Ca’ Foscari (Venice, Italy). http://dspace.unive.it/handle/10579/3501. Retrieved on Mar 15, 2019.

  • Wierbizka, A. (1985). Different cultures, different languages, different speech acts. Journal of Pragmatics,9, 145–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wierbizka, A. (1992). Semantics, culture and cognition: Universal human concepts in cultural-specific configurations. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wierbizka, A. (2003). Cross-cultural pragmatics. The semantics of human interaction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zorzi, D., Brodine, R., Gavioli, L., & Aston, G. (1990). Opening and closing service encounters: Some differences between English and Italian. In C. De Stasio, M. Gotti, & R. Bonadei (Eds.), La rappresentazione verbale e iconica: valori estetici e funzionali. Atti del XI congresso nazionale dell’AIA (pp. 445–458). Milano: Guerini.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Università degli Studi Roma Tre, Via Ostiense 234, 00146, Rome, Italy

    Elena Nuzzo

  2. California State University, Long Beach, 1250 Bellflower Blvd, Long Beach, CA, 90840, USA

    Diego Cortés Velásquez

Authors
  1. Elena Nuzzo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Diego Cortés Velásquez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elena Nuzzo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nuzzo, E., Cortés Velásquez, D. Canceling Last Minute in Italian and Colombian Spanish: A Cross-Cultural Account of Pragmalinguistic Strategies. Corpus Pragmatics 4, 333–358 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-020-00084-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-020-00084-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation