Meiotic drive and evolution of female choice

Reinhold K, Engqvist L, Misof B, Kurtz J (1999)
Proceedings of the Royal Society B 266(1426): 1341-1345.

Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
 
Download
OA
Autor*in
Reinhold, KlausUniBi; Engqvist, LeifUniBi ; Misof, Bernhard; Kurtz, Joachim
Abstract / Bemerkung
As a special version of the good-genes hypothesis, it was recently proposed that females could benefit from choosing drive-resistant males in a meiotic drive system. Here, we examine with a three-locus, six-allele population genetic model whether female choice for drive resistance can evolve. An allele leading to female preference for drive-resistant males was introduced at low frequency into a population polymorphic for meiotic drive and drive resistance. Our simulations show that female choice of drive-resistant males is disadvantageous when resistance is Y-linked. This disadvantage occurs because, at equilibrium, drive-resistant males have lower reproductive success than drive-susceptible males. Thus, female choice of drive-susceptible males can evolve when resistance is Y-linked. When resistance is autosomal, selection on female choice for drive resistance is less strong and depends on the frequency of choice: female preference of resistant males is favoured when choice is rare and disadvantageous when choice is frequent, leading to a stable equilibrium at a low frequency of the choice allele. Independent of the location of drive resistance alleles, males with the non-driving allele always have above average reproductive success. Female choice is therefore beneficial when choosy females prefer males with the non- driving allele.
Stichworte
populations; selection; t-complex; sexual selection; drosophila- pseudoobscura; sex-ratio polymorphism; Stalk-eyed flies; mating preferences; house mice; numeric simulation; population genetics; selfish genes; fitness; trait; drive resistance
Erscheinungsjahr
1999
Zeitschriftentitel
Proceedings of the Royal Society B
Band
266
Ausgabe
1426
Seite(n)
1341-1345
ISSN
0962-8452
eISSN
1471-2954
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2395770

Zitieren

Reinhold K, Engqvist L, Misof B, Kurtz J. Meiotic drive and evolution of female choice. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 1999;266(1426):1341-1345.
Reinhold, K., Engqvist, L., Misof, B., & Kurtz, J. (1999). Meiotic drive and evolution of female choice. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 266(1426), 1341-1345. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1999.0785
Reinhold, Klaus, Engqvist, Leif, Misof, Bernhard, and Kurtz, Joachim. 1999. “Meiotic drive and evolution of female choice”. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 266 (1426): 1341-1345.
Reinhold, K., Engqvist, L., Misof, B., and Kurtz, J. (1999). Meiotic drive and evolution of female choice. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 266, 1341-1345.
Reinhold, K., et al., 1999. Meiotic drive and evolution of female choice. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 266(1426), p 1341-1345.
K. Reinhold, et al., “Meiotic drive and evolution of female choice”, Proceedings of the Royal Society B, vol. 266, 1999, pp. 1341-1345.
Reinhold, K., Engqvist, L., Misof, B., Kurtz, J.: Meiotic drive and evolution of female choice. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 266, 1341-1345 (1999).
Reinhold, Klaus, Engqvist, Leif, Misof, Bernhard, and Kurtz, Joachim. “Meiotic drive and evolution of female choice”. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 266.1426 (1999): 1341-1345.
Alle Dateien verfügbar unter der/den folgenden Lizenz(en):
Copyright Statement:
Dieses Objekt ist durch das Urheberrecht und/oder verwandte Schutzrechte geschützt. [...]
Volltext(e)
Access Level
OA Open Access
Zuletzt Hochgeladen
2019-09-06T08:57:57Z
MD5 Prüfsumme
8529c6e647c9ec8d7c0e10e85ec8a4b1


7 Zitationen in Europe PMC

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

Promiscuity punishes sexual deviants.
Engqvist L, Ramm SA., Mol Ecol 26(20), 2017
PMID: 29080372
The evolution of costly mate choice against segregation distorters.
Manser A, Lindholm AK, Weissing FJ., Evolution 71(12), 2017
PMID: 29071709
Can cytoplasmic incompatibility inducing Wolbachia promote the evolution of mate preferences?
Champion de Crespigny FE, Butlin RK, Wedell N., J Evol Biol 18(4), 2005
PMID: 16033569
Male killing can select for male mate choice: a novel solution to the paradox of the lek.
Randerson JP, Jiggins FM, Hurst LD., Proc Biol Sci 267(1446), 2000
PMID: 10853728

14 References

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

The sex-ratio trait in Drosophila simulans: genetic analysis of distortion and suppression.
Cazemajor M, Landre C, Montchamp-Moreau C., Genetics 147(2), 1997
PMID: 9335600
Meiotic drive and unisexual hybrid sterility: a comment.
Charlesworth B, Coyne JA, Orr HA., Genetics 133(2), 1993
PMID: 8436280
Natural selection and Y-linked polymorphism.
Clark AG., Genetics 115(3), 1987
PMID: 3569883
Genes that violate Mendel's rules.
Crow JF., Sci. Am. 240(2), 1979
PMID: 105406
Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites?
Hamilton WD, Zuk M., Science 218(4570), 1982
PMID: 7123238
Selfish genes and meiotic drive.
Hurst LD., Nature 391(6664), 1998
PMID: 9440681
Sex chromosome meiotic drive in stalk-eyed flies.
Presgraves DC, Severance E, Wilkinson GS., Genetics 147(3), 1997
PMID: 9383060
Fitness reduction associated with the deletion of a satellite DNA array.
Wu CI, True JR, Johnson N., Nature 341(6239), 1989
PMID: 2506453
Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®
Quellen

PMID: 10445289
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar