Notes
In an earlier essay, Loomba argues for the need of a criticism that crosses temporal and geographical boundaries (Loomba, 2007).
For a similar critique, see Peter Erickson and Kim Hall’s introduction to a special issue of Shakespeare Quarterly devoted to race: ‘But after more than twenty years of scholarship in early modern studies, we can only conclude that these acts of refusal [to acknowledge race] are also due to a pathological averseness to thinking about race under the guise of protecting historical difference’ (Erikson and Hall, 2016, 2).
References
Dinshaw, C. 2012. How Soon is Now?: Medieval Texts, Amateur Readers, and the Queerness of Time. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Erickson, P. and Hall, K. 2016. ‘A New Scholarly Song’ : Rereading Early Modern Race. Shakespeare Quarterly 67(1): 1–13.
Heng, G. 2003. Empire of Magic: Medieval Romance and the Politics of Cultural Fantasy. New York: Columbia University Press.
Heng, G. 2018. The Invention of Race in the European Middle Ages. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Loomba, A. 2007. Periodization, Race, and Global Contact. Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies 37(3): 595–620.
Loomba, A. 2014. Early Modern or Early Colonial? Journal of Early Modern Cultural Studies 14(1): 143–8.
Spiller. E. 2011. Reading and the History of Race in the Renaissance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Britton, D.A. Histories and temporalities past, present, and future. Postmedieval 10, 111–126 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41280-018-0118-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41280-018-0118-y