This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References Cited
Allen, N.J., 1986, “The Ideology of the Indo-Europeans: Dumézil’s Theory and the Idea of a Fourth Function,”International Journal of Moral and Social Studies 2:23–39.
—, 1993, “Arjuna and Odysseus: A Comparative Approach,”South Asia Library Group News-letter 40:39–43.
—, 1996, “Romulus and the Fourth Function,” in:Indo-European Religion after Dumézil, ed. Edgar C. Polomé, Journal of Indo-European Studies Monograph No. 16 (Washington, D.C.: Institute for the Study of Man), pp. 13–36.
Erebon, Didier, 1992,Faut-il brûler Dumézil? (Paris: Flammarion).
Grottanelli, Cristiano, 1986, “Yoked Horses, Twins and the Powerful Lady: India, Greece, Ireland and Elsewhere,”Journal of Indo-European Studies 14:125–152.
Littleton, C. Scott, 1982, “The New Comparative Mythology: An Anthropological Assessment of the Theories of Georges Dumézil, 3rd ed. (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press).
—, 1970, “Some Possible Indo-European Themes in the Iliad,” in:Myth and Law among the Indo-Europeans, ed. Jaan Puhvel (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press), pp. 229–246.
Penglase, Charles, 1994,Greek Myths and Mesopotamia: Parallels and Influences in the Homeric Hymns and Hesiod, (London & New York: Routledge).
Scully, Stephen, 1997, “Whose Greece?” (review of Penglase 1994),International Journal of the Classical Tradition 42) (Fall 1997):247–255.
Sommer, Richard J., 1987, “TheOdyssey and Primitive Religion,” in:Critical Essays on Homer, ed., Kenneth Atchity, et al., (Boston: G.K. Hall & Co.), pp. 187–211.
Ward, Donald G., 1968,The Divine Twins: An Indo-European Myth in Germanic Tradition, Folklore Studies No. 19 (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press).
References
See Kenneth Charlton,Education in Renaissance England (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1965), 51.
Thomas More, “Letter to Oxford University” (1518), quoted in Charlton, 64.
Michael Van Cleave Alexander,The Growth of English Education, 1348–1648 (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1990), 188–89.
Suzuki,Metamorphoses of Helen: Authority, Difference, and the Epic (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990); Krier,Gazing on Secret Sights: Spenser, Classical Imitation, and the Decorums of Vision (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990); Wofford:The Choice of Achilles: The Ideology of Figure in the Epic (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1992).
King,Spenser’s Poetry and the Reformation Tradition (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990); Anthea Hume,Edmund Spenser: Protestant Poet (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984); David Norbrook,Poetry and Politics in the English Renaissance (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1984).
Lamberton,Homer the Theologian: Neoplatonist Allegorical Reading and the Growth of the Epic Tradition (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986); Whitman,Allegory: The Dynamiccs of an Ancient and Medieval Technique (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1987).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Littleton, C.S., Bardel, R., Loehr, J. et al. Book reviews. Int class trad 4, 624–647 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02689196
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02689196