Abstract
In electrospray ionization (ESI)-ion mobility spectrometry, continuously generated ions must be desolvated in a first tube before short ion pulses are introduced into a second (drift) tube. Both tubes are separated by an ion-gate. The resolving power of the resulting drift time spectrum is strongly influenced by the design of the ion gate. In the case of the Bradbury-Nielsen gates typically used, an orthogonal field between oppositely charged, parallel wires blocks ions from entering the drift tube. However, the blocking field also distorts the entering ion cloud. One alternative, which eliminates these effects and therefore enables a potentially higher resolving power, is already known for spectrometers with small ionization volumes, where ions are formed between two electrodes and subsequently transferred into the drift tube by a high voltage pulse. Based on this setup, we introduce an alternative ion gate design for liquid samples, named field switching ion gate (FSIG). The continuous flow of ions generated by ESI is desolvated in the first tube and introduced into the space between two electrodes (repeller and transfer electrodes). A third (blocking) electrode prevents the movement of ions into the drift tube in the closed state. Ions are transferred during the open state by pulsing the voltages of the repeller and blocking electrodes. First results demonstrate an increase of the resolving power by 100% without intensity losses and further changes in the spectrometer setup. The parameters of the FSIG, such as electrode voltages and pulse width, are characterized allowing the optimization of the spectrometer’s resolving power.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cottingham K (2003) Ion mobility spectrometry rediscovered. Anal Chem 75:435 A–439 A
Kirk AT, Zimmermann S (2015) An analytical model for the optimum drift voltage of drift tube ion mobility spectrometers with respect to resolving power and detection limits. Int J Ion Mobil Spectrom 18:129–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12127-015-0176-x
Tabrizchi M (2004) Temperature effects on resolution in ion mobility spectrometry. Talanta 62:65–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-9140(03)00401-6
Siems WF, Wu C, Tarver EE et al (1994) Measuring the resolving power of ion mobility spectrometers. Anal Chem 66:4195–4201. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00095a014
Dugourd P, Hudgins RR, Clemmer DE, Jarrold MF (1997) High-resolution ion mobility measurements. Rev Sci Instrum 68:1122–1129. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1147873
Bradbury NE, Nielsen RA (1936) Absolute values of the electron mobility in hydrogen. Phys Rev 49:388–393. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.49.388
Tyndall AM (1938) The mobility of positive ions in gases. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Kirk AT, Zimmermann S (2014) Bradbury-Nielsen vs. field switching shutters for high resolution drift tube ion mobility spectrometers. Int J Ion Mobil Spectrom 17:131–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12127-014-0153-9
Kirk AT, Allers M, Cochems P et al (2013) A compact high resolution ion mobility spectrometer for fast trace gas analysis. Analyst 138:5200–5207. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3an00231d
Kirk AT, Zimmermann S (2015) Pushing a compact 15cm long ultra-high resolution drift tube ion mobility spectrometer with R = 250 to R = 425 using peak deconvolution. Int J Ion Mobil Spectrom 18:17–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12127-015-0166-z
Chen C, Tabrizchi M, Wang W, Li H (2015) Field switching combined with Bradbury-Nielsen gate for ion mobility spectrometry. Anal Chem 87:7925–7930. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.5b01737
Reinecke T, Thoben C, Zimmermann S et al (2016) A compact high resolution electrospray ionization ion mobility spectrometer. Talanta 150:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2015.12.006
Zühlke M, Riebe D, Beitz T et al (2015) An electrospray ionization-ion mobility spectrometer as detector for high- performance liquid chromatography. Eur J Mass Spectrom (Chichester, Eng) 21:391–402. https://doi.org/10.1255/ejms.1367
Eiceman GA, Nazarov EG, Stone JA (2003) Chemical standards in ion mobility spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta 493:185–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(03)00762-1
Tabrizchi M, Khayamian T, Taj N (2000) Design and optimization of a corona discharge ionization source for ion mobility spectrometry. Rev Sci Instrum 71:2321. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1150618
Zühlke M, Zenichowski K, Riebe D et al (2017) Subambient pressure electrospray ionization ion mobility spectrometry. Int J Ion Mobil Spectrom 20:47–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12127-017-0215-x
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support for this research received from the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi) through the AiF (Grant No. KF2167703NT2).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zühlke, M., Zenichowski, K., Riebe, D. et al. An alternative field switching ion gate for ESI-ion mobility spectrometry. Int. J. Ion Mobil. Spec. 20, 67–73 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12127-017-0222-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12127-017-0222-y