Skip to main content
Log in

An alternative field switching ion gate for ESI-ion mobility spectrometry

  • Original Research
  • Published:
International Journal for Ion Mobility Spectrometry

Abstract

In electrospray ionization (ESI)-ion mobility spectrometry, continuously generated ions must be desolvated in a first tube before short ion pulses are introduced into a second (drift) tube. Both tubes are separated by an ion-gate. The resolving power of the resulting drift time spectrum is strongly influenced by the design of the ion gate. In the case of the Bradbury-Nielsen gates typically used, an orthogonal field between oppositely charged, parallel wires blocks ions from entering the drift tube. However, the blocking field also distorts the entering ion cloud. One alternative, which eliminates these effects and therefore enables a potentially higher resolving power, is already known for spectrometers with small ionization volumes, where ions are formed between two electrodes and subsequently transferred into the drift tube by a high voltage pulse. Based on this setup, we introduce an alternative ion gate design for liquid samples, named field switching ion gate (FSIG). The continuous flow of ions generated by ESI is desolvated in the first tube and introduced into the space between two electrodes (repeller and transfer electrodes). A third (blocking) electrode prevents the movement of ions into the drift tube in the closed state. Ions are transferred during the open state by pulsing the voltages of the repeller and blocking electrodes. First results demonstrate an increase of the resolving power by 100% without intensity losses and further changes in the spectrometer setup. The parameters of the FSIG, such as electrode voltages and pulse width, are characterized allowing the optimization of the spectrometer’s resolving power.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cottingham K (2003) Ion mobility spectrometry rediscovered. Anal Chem 75:435 A–439 A

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kirk AT, Zimmermann S (2015) An analytical model for the optimum drift voltage of drift tube ion mobility spectrometers with respect to resolving power and detection limits. Int J Ion Mobil Spectrom 18:129–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12127-015-0176-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tabrizchi M (2004) Temperature effects on resolution in ion mobility spectrometry. Talanta 62:65–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-9140(03)00401-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Siems WF, Wu C, Tarver EE et al (1994) Measuring the resolving power of ion mobility spectrometers. Anal Chem 66:4195–4201. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00095a014

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dugourd P, Hudgins RR, Clemmer DE, Jarrold MF (1997) High-resolution ion mobility measurements. Rev Sci Instrum 68:1122–1129. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1147873

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bradbury NE, Nielsen RA (1936) Absolute values of the electron mobility in hydrogen. Phys Rev 49:388–393. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.49.388

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tyndall AM (1938) The mobility of positive ions in gases. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kirk AT, Zimmermann S (2014) Bradbury-Nielsen vs. field switching shutters for high resolution drift tube ion mobility spectrometers. Int J Ion Mobil Spectrom 17:131–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12127-014-0153-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kirk AT, Allers M, Cochems P et al (2013) A compact high resolution ion mobility spectrometer for fast trace gas analysis. Analyst 138:5200–5207. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3an00231d

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kirk AT, Zimmermann S (2015) Pushing a compact 15cm long ultra-high resolution drift tube ion mobility spectrometer with R = 250 to R = 425 using peak deconvolution. Int J Ion Mobil Spectrom 18:17–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12127-015-0166-z

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen C, Tabrizchi M, Wang W, Li H (2015) Field switching combined with Bradbury-Nielsen gate for ion mobility spectrometry. Anal Chem 87:7925–7930. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.5b01737

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Reinecke T, Thoben C, Zimmermann S et al (2016) A compact high resolution electrospray ionization ion mobility spectrometer. Talanta 150:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2015.12.006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zühlke M, Riebe D, Beitz T et al (2015) An electrospray ionization-ion mobility spectrometer as detector for high- performance liquid chromatography. Eur J Mass Spectrom (Chichester, Eng) 21:391–402. https://doi.org/10.1255/ejms.1367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Eiceman GA, Nazarov EG, Stone JA (2003) Chemical standards in ion mobility spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta 493:185–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(03)00762-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tabrizchi M, Khayamian T, Taj N (2000) Design and optimization of a corona discharge ionization source for ion mobility spectrometry. Rev Sci Instrum 71:2321. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1150618

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zühlke M, Zenichowski K, Riebe D et al (2017) Subambient pressure electrospray ionization ion mobility spectrometry. Int J Ion Mobil Spectrom 20:47–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12127-017-0215-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support for this research received from the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi) through the AiF (Grant No. KF2167703NT2).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Zühlke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zühlke, M., Zenichowski, K., Riebe, D. et al. An alternative field switching ion gate for ESI-ion mobility spectrometry. Int. J. Ion Mobil. Spec. 20, 67–73 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12127-017-0222-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12127-017-0222-y

Keywords

Navigation