A new version of this entry is available:

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
ResearchPaper
2009

Can international migration ever be made a Pareto improvement?

Abstract (English)

We argue that compensating losers is more difficult for immigration than for trade and capital movements. While a tax-cum-subsidy mechanism allows the government to turn the gains from trade into a Pareto improvement, the same is not true for the so-called immigration surplus, if the redistributive mechanism is not allowed to discriminate against migrants. We discuss policy conclusions to be drawn from this fundamental asymmetry between migration and other forms of globalization.

File is subject to an embargo until

This is a new version of:

Notes

Publication license

Publication series

Hohenheimer Diskussionsbeiträge; 305

Published in

Faculty
Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences
Institute
Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre (bis 2010)

Examination date

Supervisor

Edition / version

Citation

DOI

ISSN

ISBN

Language
English

Publisher

Publisher place

Classification (DDC)
330 Economics

Original object

Free keywords

Standardized keywords (GND)