A new version of this entry is available:

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
ResearchPaper
2010

Contract design and insurance fraud : an experimental investigation

Abstract (English)

This paper investigates the impact of insurance contract design on the behavior of filing fraudulent claims in an experimental setup. We test how fraud behavior varies for insurance contracts with full coverage, a straight deductible or variable premiums (bonus-malus contract). In our experiment, filing fraudulent claims is a dominant strategy for selfish participants, with no psychological costs of committing fraud. While some people always commit fraud, a substantial share of people only occasionally or never defraud. In addition, we find that deductible contracts may be perceived as unfair and thus increase the extent of claim build-up compared to full coverage contracts. In contrast, bonus-malus contracts with variable insurance premiums significantly reduce the filing of fictitious claims compared to both full coverage and deductible contracts. This reduction cannot be explained by monetary incentives. Our results indicate that contract design significantly affects psychological costs and, consequently, the extent of fraudulent behavior of policyholders.

File is subject to an embargo until

This is a new version of:

Notes

Publication license

Publication series

FZID discussion papers; 19

Published in

Faculty
Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences
State Institutes
Institute
Institut für Haushalts- und Konsumökonomik (bis 2010)
Forschungszentrum Innovation und Dienstleistung

Examination date

Supervisor

Edition / version

Citation

DOI

ISSN

ISBN

Language
English

Publisher

Publisher place

Classification (DDC)
330 Economics

Original object