A new version of this entry is available:
Abstract (English)
Economists in the public are accused of propagating highly professional, but unrealistic theories that mislead market agents and policy makers to place too much confidence in rational behaviour and market equilibrium. The paper analyses to what extent the US banking crisis and the euro crisis can be ascribed to fallacious assessments and recommendations on the part of economic theory. In the first case, myopic financial market theory and practice had neglected systemic repercussions of micro bank trading patterns. The euro crisis emerged from the neglect of undergraduate economic wisdom of necessary adjustment mechanisms in a currency union. Economists hopefully misinterpreted current account deficits as a sign of structural change.
File is subject to an embargo until
This is a new version of:
Notes
Publication license
Publication series
FZID discussion papers; 83
Published in
Faculty
State Institutes
Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences
Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences
Institute
Forschungszentrum Innovation und Dienstleistung
Institute of Economics
Institute of Economics
Examination date
Supervisor
Edition / version
Citation
Identification
DOI
ISSN
ISBN
Language
English
Publisher
Publisher place
Classification (DDC)
330 Economics