Directly to content
  1. Publishing |
  2. Search |
  3. Browse |
  4. Recent items rss |
  5. Open Access |
  6. Jur. Issues |
  7. DeutschClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Percutaneous versus surgical strategy for tracheostomy: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative and postoperative complications

Klotz, Rosa ; Klaiber, Ulla ; Grummich, Kathrin ; Probst, Pascal ; Diener, Markus K. ; Büchler, Markus W. ; Knebel, Phillip

In: Systematic Reviews, 4 (2015), Nr. 105. pp. 1-5. ISSN 2046-4053

[thumbnail of 13643_2015_Article_92.pdf]
Preview
PDF, English
Download (403kB) | Lizenz: Creative Commons LizenzvertragPercutaneous versus surgical strategy for tracheostomy: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative and postoperative complications by Klotz, Rosa ; Klaiber, Ulla ; Grummich, Kathrin ; Probst, Pascal ; Diener, Markus K. ; Büchler, Markus W. ; Knebel, Phillip underlies the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Germany

Citation of documents: Please do not cite the URL that is displayed in your browser location input, instead use the DOI, URN or the persistent URL below, as we can guarantee their long-time accessibility.

Abstract

Background: Tracheostomy is one of the most frequently performed procedures in intensive care medicine. The two main approaches to form a tracheostoma are the open surgical tracheotomy (ST) and the interventional strategy of percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy (PDT). It is particularly important to the critically ill patients that both procedures are performed with high success rates and low complication frequencies. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review is to summarize and analyze existing and relevant evidence for peri- and postoperative parameters of safety. Methods/design: A systematic literature search will be conducted in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, LILACS, and Embase to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing peri- and postoperative complications between the two strategies and to define the strategy with the lower risk of potentially life-threatening events. A priori defined data will be extracted from included studies, and methodological quality will be assessed according to the recommendations of the Cochrane Collaboration. Discussion: The findings of this systematic review with proportional meta-analysis will help to identify the strategy with the lowest frequency of potentially life-threatening events. This may influence daily practice, and the data may be implemented in treatment guidelines or serve as the basis for planning further randomized controlled trials. Considering the critical health of these patients, they will particularly benefit from evidence-based treatment. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42015021967

Document type: Article
Journal or Publication Title: Systematic Reviews
Volume: 4
Number: 105
Publisher: BioMed Central
Place of Publication: London
Date Deposited: 08 Jan 2016 12:24
Date: 2015
ISSN: 2046-4053
Page Range: pp. 1-5
Faculties / Institutes: Medizinische Fakultät Heidelberg > Chirurgische Universitätsklinik
DDC-classification: 610 Medical sciences Medicine
About | FAQ | Contact | Imprint |
OA-LogoDINI certificate 2013Logo der Open-Archives-Initiative