Abstract:
Navigating through the environment is one of the important everyday tasks of
the visual system. This task relies on processing of at least two visual cues: visual
motion, and scene content. Our sense of motion heavily relies on understanding and
separating visual cues resulting from object motion and self-motion. Processing and
understanding of visual scenes is an equally abundant task we are exposed to in our
everyday environment. Together, motion and scene processing allow us to fulfill
navigation tasks such as way finding and spatial updating.
In terms of neural processing, both, regions involved in motion processing, and
regions involved in scene processing have been studied in great detail. However, how
motion regions are influenced by scene content and how scene regions are involved in
motion processing has barely been addressed.
In order to understand how self-motion and scene processing interact in the
human brain, I completed a series of studies as part of this thesis. First of all, using
planar horizontal motion and visual scenes, the first study of this thesis investigates
motion responses of scene regions. The next study investigates whether eye-centered or
world-centered reference frames are used during visual motion processing in scene
regions, using objective ‘real’ motion and retinal motion during pursuit eye movements
and natural scene stimuli. The third study investigates the effect of natural scene
content during objective and retinal motion processing in motion regions. The last study
investigates how motion speed is represented in motion regions during objective and
retinal motion. Since many visual areas are optimized for natural visual stimuli, the
speed responses were tested on Fourier scrambles of natural scene images in order to
provide natural scene statistics as visual input.
I found evidence that scene processing regions parahippocampal place area
(PPA) and occipital place area (OPA) are motion responsive while retrosplenial cortex
(RSC) is not. In addition, PPA’s motion responses are modulated by scene content. With
respect to reference frames, I found that PPA prefers a world-centered reference frame
while viewing dynamic scenes.
The results from motion regions (MT/V5+, V3A, V6 and cingulate sulcus visual
area (CSv)) revealed that motion responses of all of them are enhanced during exposure
to scenes compared to Fourier-scramble, whereas only V3A responded also to static
scenes. The last study showed that all motion responsive regions tested (MT/V5, MST,
V3A, V6 and CSv) are modulated by motion speed but only V3A has a distinctly stronger
speed tuning for objective compared to retinal motion.
These results reveal that using natural scene stimuli is important while
investigating self-motion responses in human brain: many scene regions are modulated
by motion and one of them (PPA) even differentiates object motion from retinal motion.
Conversely, many motion regions are modulated by scene content and one of them
(V3A) is even responsive to still scenes. Moreover, the objective motion preference of
V3A is even stronger during higher speeds. These results question a strong separation
of ‘where’ and ‘what’ pathways and show that scene region PPA and motion region V3A
have similar objective motion and scene preferences.
Print-on-Demand