Production and Perception of Word Boundary Markers in German Speech
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Word boundary markers in German speech were investigated with regard to production and perception. Seven of them were examined: glottal stops, allophonic variations of stops and /l/, silent intervals, distribution of stress, comparative vowel duration, contact geminates. In a production experiment, a speech corpus of read speech was created that contained targets with special word boundary areas as a result of splicing neighbouring words/word parts (ie. mag_er/mager, sah_T[om]/Saat). The production study revealed how frequently nonpredictable markers occured. Contact geminates were especially considered (ie. einem_Mann) which proved to be useful boundary signals. How important word boundary markers were for the recognition process, was demonstrated in a two-part perception experiment. Glottal stops and silent intervals >= 120 ms were found to be strongest.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
EISENHUTH, Heike, 2015. Production and Perception of Word Boundary Markers in German Speech [Dissertation]. Konstanz: University of KonstanzBibTex
@phdthesis{Eisenhuth2015Produ-32196, year={2015}, title={Production and Perception of Word Boundary Markers in German Speech}, author={Eisenhuth, Heike}, address={Konstanz}, school={Universität Konstanz} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/32196"> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/32196/3/Eisenhuth_0-308724.pdf"/> <dcterms:issued>2015</dcterms:issued> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/32196"/> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-11-19T14:01:46Z</dc:date> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-11-19T14:01:46Z</dcterms:available> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/32196/3/Eisenhuth_0-308724.pdf"/> <dc:contributor>Eisenhuth, Heike</dc:contributor> <dcterms:title>Production and Perception of Word Boundary Markers in German Speech</dcterms:title> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Word boundary markers in German speech were investigated with regard to production and perception. Seven of them were examined: glottal stops, allophonic variations of stops and /l/, silent intervals, distribution of stress, comparative vowel duration, contact geminates. In a production experiment, a speech corpus of read speech was created that contained targets with special word boundary areas as a result of splicing neighbouring words/word parts (ie. mag_er/mager, sah_T[om]/Saat). The production study revealed how frequently nonpredictable markers occured. Contact geminates were especially considered (ie. einem_Mann) which proved to be useful boundary signals. How important word boundary markers were for the recognition process, was demonstrated in a two-part perception experiment. Glottal stops and silent intervals >= 120 ms were found to be strongest.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:creator>Eisenhuth, Heike</dc:creator> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>