Constitutional Dynamics in the European Union : Success, Failure, and Stability of Institutional Treaty Revisions

Dörfler, Thomas; Holzinger, Katharina; Biesenbender, Jan

Constitutional Dynamics in the European Union : Success, Failure, and Stability of Institutional Treaty Revisions

Dateien

Doerfler_2--fymwb7hdsr2t7.pdfGröße: 149.49 KBDownloads: 324

Datum

2017

Open Access-Veröffentlichung

Open Access Green

Sammlungen

Politik- und Verwaltungswissenschaft

Publikationstyp

Zeitschriftenartikel

Publikationsstatus

Published

Erschienen in

International Journal of Public Administration. 2017, 40(14), pp. 1237-1249. ISSN 0190-0692. eISSN 1532-4265. Available under: doi: 10.1080/01900692.2017.1295267

Zusammenfassung

Despite high institutional hurdles for constitutional change, one observes surprisingly many EU treaty revisions. This article takes up the questions of what determines whether a treaty provision is successfully changed and why provisions are renegotiated at subsequent Intergovernmental Conferences. The article presents an institutionalist theory explaining success and renegotiation and tests the theory using all core institutional provisions by means of Qualitative Comparative Analysis. The causal analysis shows that low conflict potential of an issue is sufficient for successfully changing the treaties. Furthermore, high conflict potential of an issue and its fundamental change are sufficient for it to be renegotiated.

Fachgebiet (DDC)

320 Politik

Zitieren

ISO 690

DÖRFLER, Thomas, Katharina HOLZINGER, Jan BIESENBENDER, 2017. Constitutional Dynamics in the European Union : Success, Failure, and Stability of Institutional Treaty Revisions. In: International Journal of Public Administration. 2017, 40(14), pp. 1237-1249. ISSN 0190-0692. eISSN 1532-4265. Available under: doi: 10.1080/01900692.2017.1295267

BibTex

@article{Dorfler2017-03-28Const-38889,
  year={2017},
  doi={10.1080/01900692.2017.1295267},
  title={Constitutional Dynamics in the European Union : Success, Failure, and Stability of Institutional Treaty Revisions},
  number={14},
  volume={40},
  issn={0190-0692},
  journal={International Journal of Public Administration},
  pages={1237--1249},
  author={Dörfler, Thomas and Holzinger, Katharina and Biesenbender, Jan}
}

RDF

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/38889">
    <dc:contributor>Biesenbender, Jan</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Despite high institutional hurdles for constitutional change, one observes surprisingly many EU treaty revisions. This article takes up the questions of what determines whether a treaty provision is successfully changed and why provisions are renegotiated at subsequent Intergovernmental Conferences. The article presents an institutionalist theory explaining success and renegotiation and tests the theory using all core institutional provisions by means of Qualitative Comparative Analysis. The causal analysis shows that low conflict potential of an issue is sufficient for successfully changing the treaties. Furthermore, high conflict potential of an issue and its fundamental change are sufficient for it to be renegotiated.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:contributor>Dörfler, Thomas</dc:contributor>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/38889/1/Doerfler_2--fymwb7hdsr2t7.pdf"/>
    <dc:creator>Holzinger, Katharina</dc:creator>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/38889"/>
    <dc:contributor>Holzinger, Katharina</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Dörfler, Thomas</dc:creator>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dc:creator>Biesenbender, Jan</dc:creator>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/38889/1/Doerfler_2--fymwb7hdsr2t7.pdf"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-05-15T09:45:03Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:title>Constitutional Dynamics in the European Union : Success, Failure, and Stability of Institutional Treaty Revisions</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-05-15T09:45:03Z</dcterms:available>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2017-03-28</dcterms:issued>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Universitätsbibliographie

Ja