Making and breaking alliances : on valuation in hegemonic projects

Bodirsky, Katharina

Making and breaking alliances : on valuation in hegemonic projects

Dateien

Bodirsky_2-16s2835hqxony6.pdfGröße: 379.5 KBDownloads: 205

Datum

2021

Open Access-Veröffentlichung

Open Access Hybrid

Sammlungen

Soziologie

Publikationstyp

Zeitschriftenartikel

Publikationsstatus

Published

Erschienen in

Dialectical Anthropology. Springer. 2021, 45(1), pp. 65-80. ISSN 0304-4092. eISSN 1573-0786. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s10624-020-09585-3

Zusammenfassung

In public discourse, the polarizations that accompany the success of authoritarian populisms in recent years are often portrayed as the result of “culture wars” rooted in incompatible values. This article approaches the relation between values and politics differently. It examines the role that state and capitalist modes of valuation play for the alliance-formation underpinning hegemonic projects. The argument is illustrated with the case of Turkey where processes of devaluation and dispossession were manifold in the past years. Polarization here expresses not so much unitary political identities of opposed values than a specific, polarizing dynamic of alliance-formation in authoritarian populism. The orchestration of state and capitalist modes of valuation on the one hand allows for the formation of alliances with both dominant and subordinate social groups and on the other hand also entails contradictions that might constitute a source of fragility for the continuity of the project.

Fachgebiet (DDC)

300 Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie

Zitieren

ISO 690

BODIRSKY, Katharina, 2021. Making and breaking alliances : on valuation in hegemonic projects. In: Dialectical Anthropology. Springer. 2021, 45(1), pp. 65-80. ISSN 0304-4092. eISSN 1573-0786. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s10624-020-09585-3

BibTex

@article{Bodirsky2021-03Makin-48920,
  year={2021},
  doi={10.1007/s10624-020-09585-3},
  title={Making and breaking alliances : on valuation in hegemonic projects},
  number={1},
  volume={45},
  issn={0304-4092},
  journal={Dialectical Anthropology},
  pages={65--80},
  author={Bodirsky, Katharina}
}

RDF

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/48920">
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-03-04T07:55:28Z</dcterms:available>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:title>Making and breaking alliances : on valuation in hegemonic projects</dcterms:title>
    <dc:creator>Bodirsky, Katharina</dc:creator>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/48920"/>
    <dc:contributor>Bodirsky, Katharina</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:issued>2021-03</dcterms:issued>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/48920/1/Bodirsky_2-16s2835hqxony6.pdf"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-03-04T07:55:28Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">In public discourse, the polarizations that accompany the success of authoritarian populisms in recent years are often portrayed as the result of “culture wars” rooted in incompatible values. This article approaches the relation between values and politics differently. It examines the role that state and capitalist modes of valuation play for the alliance-formation underpinning hegemonic projects. The argument is illustrated with the case of Turkey where processes of devaluation and dispossession were manifold in the past years. Polarization here expresses not so much unitary political identities of opposed values than a specific, polarizing dynamic of alliance-formation in authoritarian populism. The orchestration of state and capitalist modes of valuation on the one hand allows for the formation of alliances with both dominant and subordinate social groups and on the other hand also entails contradictions that might constitute a source of fragility for the continuity of the project.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/48920/1/Bodirsky_2-16s2835hqxony6.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/34"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/34"/>
    <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Universitätsbibliographie

Ja

Begutachtet

Ja