Strong Reflexivity and Its Critics : Responses to Autoethnography in the German-Speaking Cultural and Social Sciences

Ploder, Andrea; Stadlbauer, Johanna

Strong Reflexivity and Its Critics : Responses to Autoethnography in the German-Speaking Cultural and Social Sciences

Dateien

Ploder_2-1l6z874tcj2sv5.pdfGröße: 128.8 KBDownloads: 486

Datum

2016

Autor:innen

Ploder, Andrea

Stadlbauer, Johanna

Open Access-Veröffentlichung

Open Access Green

Sammlungen

Soziologie

Publikationstyp

Zeitschriftenartikel

Publikationsstatus

Published

Erschienen in

Qualitative Inquiry. Sage Publications. 2016, 22(9), pp. 753-765. ISSN 1077-8004. eISSN 1552-7565. Available under: doi: 10.1177/1077800416658067

Zusammenfassung

This contribution explores autoethnography as a strongly reflexive approach to qualitative research and its reception in German-speaking sociology and cultural anthropology. Over recent years, our academic communities have developed an increased interest in autoethnography, although many reactions range from critical to hostile: It is accused of solipsism, narcissism, lack of arguments and theory, affective immediacy, non-criticizability, endorsement of neoliberal politics, a threat to disciplinary identity, and a strategic mistake in the fight for appreciation of qualitative research. We discuss each point of criticism and translate our insights into more general considerations on strong reflexivity in German-speaking cultural and social sciences.

Fachgebiet (DDC)

300 Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie

Schlagwörter

autoethnography, cultural anthropology, reflexivity, sociology, subjectivity

Zitieren

ISO 690

PLODER, Andrea, Johanna STADLBAUER, 2016. Strong Reflexivity and Its Critics : Responses to Autoethnography in the German-Speaking Cultural and Social Sciences. In: Qualitative Inquiry. Sage Publications. 2016, 22(9), pp. 753-765. ISSN 1077-8004. eISSN 1552-7565. Available under: doi: 10.1177/1077800416658067

BibTex

@article{Ploder2016Stron-53369,
  year={2016},
  doi={10.1177/1077800416658067},
  title={Strong Reflexivity and Its Critics : Responses to Autoethnography in the German-Speaking Cultural and Social Sciences},
  number={9},
  volume={22},
  issn={1077-8004},
  journal={Qualitative Inquiry},
  pages={753--765},
  author={Ploder, Andrea and Stadlbauer, Johanna}
}

RDF

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/53369">
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/53369/3/Ploder_2-1l6z874tcj2sv5.pdf"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/53369/3/Ploder_2-1l6z874tcj2sv5.pdf"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:contributor>Stadlbauer, Johanna</dc:contributor>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/34"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/34"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2016</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:creator>Ploder, Andrea</dc:creator>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/53369"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-04-12T09:14:15Z</dc:date>
    <dc:contributor>Ploder, Andrea</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-04-12T09:14:15Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dcterms:title>Strong Reflexivity and Its Critics : Responses to Autoethnography in the German-Speaking Cultural and Social Sciences</dcterms:title>
    <dc:creator>Stadlbauer, Johanna</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This contribution explores autoethnography as a strongly reflexive approach to qualitative research and its reception in German-speaking sociology and cultural anthropology. Over recent years, our academic communities have developed an increased interest in autoethnography, although many reactions range from critical to hostile: It is accused of solipsism, narcissism, lack of arguments and theory, affective immediacy, non-criticizability, endorsement of neoliberal politics, a threat to disciplinary identity, and a strategic mistake in the fight for appreciation of qualitative research. We discuss each point of criticism and translate our insights into more general considerations on strong reflexivity in German-speaking cultural and social sciences.</dcterms:abstract>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Universitätsbibliographie

Nein

Begutachtet

Ja