Sex-specific association patterns in bonobos and chimpanzees reflect species differences in cooperation

Lade...
Vorschaubild
Dateien
Surbeck_2-1s0br1fdrlef05.pdf
Surbeck_2-1s0br1fdrlef05.pdfGröße: 869.08 KBDownloads: 112
Datum
2017
Autor:innen
Surbeck, Martin
Girard-Buttoz, Cédric
Boesch, Christophe
Crockford, Catherine
Hohmann, Gottfried
Langergraber, Kevin E.
Zuberbühler, Klaus
Wittig, Roman M.
Mundry, Roger
Herausgeber:innen
Kontakt
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Gold
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Gesperrt bis
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Forschungsvorhaben
Organisationseinheiten
Zeitschriftenheft
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
Royal Society Open Science. Royal Society of London. 2017, 4(5), 161081. eISSN 2054-5703. Available under: doi: 10.1098/rsos.161081
Zusammenfassung

In several group-living species, individuals' social preferences are thought to be influenced by cooperation. For some societies with fission-fusion dynamics, sex-specific association patterns reflect sex differences in cooperation in within- and between-group contexts. In our study, we investigated this hypothesis further by comparing sex-specific association patterns in two closely related species, chimpanzees and bonobos, which differ in the level of between-group competition and in the degree to which sex and kinship influence dyadic cooperation. Here, we used long-term party composition data collected on five chimpanzee and two bonobo communities and assessed, for each individual of 10 years and older, the sex of its top associate and of all conspecifics with whom it associated more frequently than expected by chance. We found clear species differences in association patterns. While in all chimpanzee communities males and females associated more with same-sex partners, in bonobos males and females tended to associate preferentially with females, but the female association preference for other females is lower than in chimpanzees. Our results also show that, for bonobos (but not for chimpanzees), association patterns were predominantly driven by mother-offspring relationships. These species differences in association patterns reflect the high levels of male-male cooperation in chimpanzees and of mother-son cooperation in bonobos. Finally, female chimpanzees showed intense association with a few other females, and male chimpanzees showed more uniform association across males. In bonobos, the most differentiated associations were from males towards females. Chimpanzee male association patterns mirror fundamental human male social traits and, as in humans, may have evolved as a response to strong between-group competition. The lack of such a pattern in a closely related species with a lower degree of between-group competition further supports this notion.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
570 Biowissenschaften, Biologie
Schlagwörter
sexual segregation, Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, sociality, kinship, competition
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690SURBECK, Martin, Cédric GIRARD-BUTTOZ, Christophe BOESCH, Catherine CROCKFORD, Barbara FRUTH, Gottfried HOHMANN, Kevin E. LANGERGRABER, Klaus ZUBERBÜHLER, Roman M. WITTIG, Roger MUNDRY, 2017. Sex-specific association patterns in bonobos and chimpanzees reflect species differences in cooperation. In: Royal Society Open Science. Royal Society of London. 2017, 4(5), 161081. eISSN 2054-5703. Available under: doi: 10.1098/rsos.161081
BibTex
@article{Surbeck2017-05Sexsp-56573,
  year={2017},
  doi={10.1098/rsos.161081},
  title={Sex-specific association patterns in bonobos and chimpanzees reflect species differences in cooperation},
  number={5},
  volume={4},
  journal={Royal Society Open Science},
  author={Surbeck, Martin and Girard-Buttoz, Cédric and Boesch, Christophe and Crockford, Catherine and Fruth, Barbara and Hohmann, Gottfried and Langergraber, Kevin E. and Zuberbühler, Klaus and Wittig, Roman M. and Mundry, Roger},
  note={Article Number: 161081}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/56573">
    <dc:creator>Wittig, Roman M.</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Zuberbühler, Klaus</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Boesch, Christophe</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Crockford, Catherine</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Mundry, Roger</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">In several group-living species, individuals' social preferences are thought to be influenced by cooperation. For some societies with fission-fusion dynamics, sex-specific association patterns reflect sex differences in cooperation in within- and between-group contexts. In our study, we investigated this hypothesis further by comparing sex-specific association patterns in two closely related species, chimpanzees and bonobos, which differ in the level of between-group competition and in the degree to which sex and kinship influence dyadic cooperation. Here, we used long-term party composition data collected on five chimpanzee and two bonobo communities and assessed, for each individual of 10 years and older, the sex of its top associate and of all conspecifics with whom it associated more frequently than expected by chance. We found clear species differences in association patterns. While in all chimpanzee communities males and females associated more with same-sex partners, in bonobos males and females tended to associate preferentially with females, but the female association preference for other females is lower than in chimpanzees. Our results also show that, for bonobos (but not for chimpanzees), association patterns were predominantly driven by mother-offspring relationships. These species differences in association patterns reflect the high levels of male-male cooperation in chimpanzees and of mother-son cooperation in bonobos. Finally, female chimpanzees showed intense association with a few other females, and male chimpanzees showed more uniform association across males. In bonobos, the most differentiated associations were from males towards females. Chimpanzee male association patterns mirror fundamental human male social traits and, as in humans, may have evolved as a response to strong between-group competition. The lack of such a pattern in a closely related species with a lower degree of between-group competition further supports this notion.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:contributor>Langergraber, Kevin E.</dc:contributor>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:contributor>Wittig, Roman M.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/56573/5/Surbeck_2-1s0br1fdrlef05.pdf"/>
    <dc:creator>Surbeck, Martin</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Girard-Buttoz, Cédric</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Mundry, Roger</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Boesch, Christophe</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Hohmann, Gottfried</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Hohmann, Gottfried</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Surbeck, Martin</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-02-15T15:07:24Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <dc:creator>Crockford, Catherine</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Zuberbühler, Klaus</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Langergraber, Kevin E.</dc:creator>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/56573"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2017-05</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/56573/5/Surbeck_2-1s0br1fdrlef05.pdf"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-02-15T15:07:24Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:title>Sex-specific association patterns in bonobos and chimpanzees reflect species differences in cooperation</dcterms:title>
    <dc:creator>Girard-Buttoz, Cédric</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Fruth, Barbara</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Fruth, Barbara</dc:contributor>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.
Prüfdatum der URL
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Begutachtet
Ja
Diese Publikation teilen