Serological determinants of COVID-19
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Background
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection spreaded rapidly worldwide, as far as it has become a global pandemic. Therefore, the introduction of serological tests for determination of IgM and IgG antibodies has become the main diagnostic tool, useful for tracking the spread of the virus and for consequently allowing its containment. In our study we compared point of care test (POCT) lateral flow immunoassay (FIA) vs automated chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA), in order to assess their specificity and sensibility for COVID-19 antibodies detection.
Results
We find that different specificities and sensitivities for IgM and IgG tests. Notably IgM POCT FIA method vs CLIA method (gold standard) has a low sensitivity (0.526), while IgG POCT FIA method vs CLIA method (gold standard) test has a much higher sensitivity (0.937); further, with respect of IgG, FIA and CLIA could arguably provide equivalent information. Conclusions
FIA method could be helpful in assessing in short time, the possible contagiousness of subjects that for work reasons cannot guarantee “social distancing”.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
NOCE, Annalisa, Maria Luisa SANTORO, Giulia MARRONE, Cartesio D'AGOSTINI, Ivano AMELIO, Andrea DUGGENTO, Manfredi TESAURO, Nicola DI DANIELE, 2020. Serological determinants of COVID-19. In: Biology direct. BioMed Central. 2020, 15(1), 21. eISSN 1745-6150. Available under: doi: 10.1186/s13062-020-00276-1BibTex
@article{Noce2020Serol-56676, year={2020}, doi={10.1186/s13062-020-00276-1}, title={Serological determinants of COVID-19}, number={1}, volume={15}, journal={Biology direct}, author={Noce, Annalisa and Santoro, Maria Luisa and Marrone, Giulia and D'Agostini, Cartesio and Amelio, Ivano and Duggento, Andrea and Tesauro, Manfredi and Di Daniele, Nicola}, note={Article Number: 21} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/56676"> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Background<br />Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection spreaded rapidly worldwide, as far as it has become a global pandemic. Therefore, the introduction of serological tests for determination of IgM and IgG antibodies has become the main diagnostic tool, useful for tracking the spread of the virus and for consequently allowing its containment. In our study we compared point of care test (POCT) lateral flow immunoassay (FIA) vs automated chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA), in order to assess their specificity and sensibility for COVID-19 antibodies detection.<br />Results<br />We find that different specificities and sensitivities for IgM and IgG tests. Notably IgM POCT FIA method vs CLIA method (gold standard) has a low sensitivity (0.526), while IgG POCT FIA method vs CLIA method (gold standard) test has a much higher sensitivity (0.937); further, with respect of IgG, FIA and CLIA could arguably provide equivalent information. Conclusions<br />FIA method could be helpful in assessing in short time, the possible contagiousness of subjects that for work reasons cannot guarantee “social distancing”.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:creator>Amelio, Ivano</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Duggento, Andrea</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Tesauro, Manfredi</dc:creator> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-02-24T11:37:52Z</dcterms:available> <dc:contributor>Santoro, Maria Luisa</dc:contributor> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/56676"/> <dcterms:title>Serological determinants of COVID-19</dcterms:title> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/56676/3/Amelio_2-1vmqda5taki876.pdf"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-02-24T11:37:52Z</dc:date> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/> <dc:contributor>Amelio, Ivano</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Noce, Annalisa</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Noce, Annalisa</dc:contributor> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:contributor>Duggento, Andrea</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Di Daniele, Nicola</dc:creator> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/> <dcterms:issued>2020</dcterms:issued> <dc:creator>D'Agostini, Cartesio</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Marrone, Giulia</dc:creator> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dc:contributor>Tesauro, Manfredi</dc:contributor> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:contributor>Di Daniele, Nicola</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Santoro, Maria Luisa</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>D'Agostini, Cartesio</dc:contributor> <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/56676/3/Amelio_2-1vmqda5taki876.pdf"/> <dc:contributor>Marrone, Giulia</dc:contributor> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>