Revision of the calibration experiment in asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation
Dateien
Datum
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation is a versatile chromatographic fractionation method. In combination with at least one detection technique it is used for size-based separation of colloids, biomolecules and polymers. Although often used as pure separation method, a well-elaborated theory is available that allows precise quantification of the translational diffusion coefficient D. Still, current literature suggests different ways to transform this theory into applicable experimental procedures and no “gold standard” for correct data processing exists. While some sources report a direct way to extract diffusion information from the fractogram, others suggest the necessity of an external calibration measurement to obtain the channel width w. In this work, we compare the different approaches and calibration algorithms based on original and literature data using our own open-source AF4 evaluation software. Based on the results, we conclude that available AF4 setups do not fulfill the requirements for absolute measurements of D. We show that the best way to conduct is to consider the area of the channel and D of the calibrant while neglecting the small peak which occurs in the void peak region.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
HÄUSELE, Benedikt, Maxim Benjamin GINDELE, Helmut CÖLFEN, 2021. Revision of the calibration experiment in asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation. In: Journal of Chromatography A. Elsevier. 2021, 1635, 461631. ISSN 0021-9673. eISSN 1873-3778. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2020.461631BibTex
@article{Hausele2021-01-04Revis-51738,
year={2021},
doi={10.1016/j.chroma.2020.461631},
title={Revision of the calibration experiment in asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation},
volume={1635},
issn={0021-9673},
journal={Journal of Chromatography A},
author={Häusele, Benedikt and Gindele, Maxim Benjamin and Cölfen, Helmut},
note={Article Number: 461631}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/51738">
<dcterms:title>Revision of the calibration experiment in asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation</dcterms:title>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-11-11T10:00:46Z</dcterms:available>
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
<dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/51738/1/Haeusele_2-1wh36el1fn06y0.pdf"/>
<dc:creator>Häusele, Benedikt</dc:creator>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-11-11T10:00:46Z</dc:date>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dcterms:issued>2021-01-04</dcterms:issued>
<dc:creator>Gindele, Maxim Benjamin</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>Häusele, Benedikt</dc:contributor>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dc:creator>Cölfen, Helmut</dc:creator>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/29"/>
<dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation is a versatile chromatographic fractionation method. In combination with at least one detection technique it is used for size-based separation of colloids, biomolecules and polymers. Although often used as pure separation method, a well-elaborated theory is available that allows precise quantification of the translational diffusion coefficient D. Still, current literature suggests different ways to transform this theory into applicable experimental procedures and no “gold standard” for correct data processing exists. While some sources report a direct way to extract diffusion information from the fractogram, others suggest the necessity of an external calibration measurement to obtain the channel width w. In this work, we compare the different approaches and calibration algorithms based on original and literature data using our own open-source AF4 evaluation software. Based on the results, we conclude that available AF4 setups do not fulfill the requirements for absolute measurements of D. We show that the best way to conduct is to consider the area of the channel and D of the calibrant while neglecting the small peak which occurs in the void peak region.</dcterms:abstract>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/51738"/>
<dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
<dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/51738/1/Haeusele_2-1wh36el1fn06y0.pdf"/>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/29"/>
<dc:contributor>Cölfen, Helmut</dc:contributor>
<dc:contributor>Gindele, Maxim Benjamin</dc:contributor>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
