@article{Bonner2021Curre-53203,
  year={2021},
  doi={10.1177/0272989X21996328},
  title={Current Best Practice for Presenting Probabilities in Patient Decision Aids : Fundamental Principles},
  number={7},
  volume={41},
  issn={0272-989X},
  journal={Medical Decision Making (MDM)},
  pages={821--833},
  author={Bonner, Carissa and Trevena, Lyndal J. and Gaissmaier, Wolfgang and Han, Paul K. J. and Okan, Yasmina and Ozanne, Elissa and Peters, Ellen and Timmermans, Danielle and Zikmund-Fisher, Brian J.}
}

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/53203">
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Bonner, Carissa</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Okan, Yasmina</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Trevena, Lyndal J.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Okan, Yasmina</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Ozanne, Elissa</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/53203/1/Bonner_2-4e0612wigy6x0.pdf"/>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/53203/1/Bonner_2-4e0612wigy6x0.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-03-19T10:05:10Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:creator>Gaissmaier, Wolfgang</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43613"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43613"/>
    <dc:creator>Zikmund-Fisher, Brian J.</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:title>Current Best Practice for Presenting Probabilities in Patient Decision Aids : Fundamental Principles</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Background&lt;br /&gt;Shared decision making requires evidence to be conveyed to the patient in a way they can easily understand and compare. Patient decision aids facilitate this process. This article reviews the current evidence for how to present numerical probabilities within patient decision aids.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Methods&lt;br /&gt;Following the 2013 review method, we assembled a group of 9 international experts on risk communication across Australia, Germany, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States. We expanded the topics covered in the first review to reflect emerging areas of research. Groups of 2 to 3 authors reviewed the relevant literature based on their expertise and wrote each section before review by the full authorship team.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Results&lt;br /&gt;Of 10 topics identified, we present 5 fundamental issues in this article. Although some topics resulted in clear guidance (presenting the chance an event will occur, addressing numerical skills), other topics (context/evaluative labels, conveying uncertainty, risk over time) continue to have evolving knowledge bases. We recommend presenting numbers over a set time period with a clear denominator, using consistent formats between outcomes and interventions to enable unbiased comparisons, and interpreting the numbers for the reader to meet the needs of varying numeracy.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Discussion&lt;br /&gt;Understanding how different numerical formats can bias risk perception will help decision aid developers communicate risks in a balanced, comprehensible manner and avoid accidental “nudging” toward a particular option. Decisions between probability formats need to consider the available evidence and user skills. The review may be useful for other areas of science communication in which unbiased presentation of probabilities is important.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:creator>Trevena, Lyndal J.</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Han, Paul K. J.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Zikmund-Fisher, Brian J.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-03-19T10:05:10Z</dc:date>
    <dc:creator>Han, Paul K. J.</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Peters, Ellen</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:issued>2021</dcterms:issued>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:creator>Peters, Ellen</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Timmermans, Danielle</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Ozanne, Elissa</dc:creator>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>Timmermans, Danielle</dc:creator>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dc:creator>Bonner, Carissa</dc:creator>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:contributor>Gaissmaier, Wolfgang</dc:contributor>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/53203"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>