Emotion emphasis effects in moral judgment are moderated by mindsets

Doerflinger, Johannes; Gollwitzer, Peter M.

Emotion emphasis effects in moral judgment are moderated by mindsets

Dateien

Doerflinger_2-fi738tnd8dxf0.pdfGröße: 1.21 MBDownloads: 164

Datum

2020

Open Access-Veröffentlichung

Open Access Hybrid

Sammlungen

Psychologie

Publikationstyp

Zeitschriftenartikel

Publikationsstatus

Published

Erschienen in

Motivation and Emotion. Springer. 2020, 44(6), pp. 880-896. ISSN 0146-7239. eISSN 1573-6644. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s11031-020-09847-1

Zusammenfassung

In two studies, emotion emphasis effects on moral judgment are demonstrated. The studies indicate that emphasizing negative consequences in trolley-type dilemmas with emotional language produces more utilitarian responses if such emphasis is on the consequences of the deontological option, and more deontological responses if it is on the consequences of the utilitarian option. This effect was moderated by action-phase related mindsets. Individuals in an implemental mindset were less susceptible to the emotion emphasis effect than individuals in a deliberative mindset (Studies 1, 2). By also using an eye-tracking task in Study 2, we demonstrated that our implemental mindset participants’ visual attention was more focused—in particular on goal-directed means—than that of the deliberative mindset participants.

Fachgebiet (DDC)

150 Psychologie

Zitieren

ISO 690

DOERFLINGER, Johannes, Peter M. GOLLWITZER, 2020. Emotion emphasis effects in moral judgment are moderated by mindsets. In: Motivation and Emotion. Springer. 2020, 44(6), pp. 880-896. ISSN 0146-7239. eISSN 1573-6644. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s11031-020-09847-1

BibTex

@article{Doerflinger2020-12Emoti-50451,
  year={2020},
  doi={10.1007/s11031-020-09847-1},
  title={Emotion emphasis effects in moral judgment are moderated by mindsets},
  number={6},
  volume={44},
  issn={0146-7239},
  journal={Motivation and Emotion},
  pages={880--896},
  author={Doerflinger, Johannes and Gollwitzer, Peter M.}
}

RDF

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/50451">
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Gollwitzer, Peter M.</dc:contributor>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-08-05T12:35:23Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2020-12</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">In two studies, emotion emphasis effects on moral judgment are demonstrated. The studies indicate that emphasizing negative consequences in trolley-type dilemmas with emotional language produces more utilitarian responses if such emphasis is on the consequences of the deontological option, and more deontological responses if it is on the consequences of the utilitarian option. This effect was moderated by action-phase related mindsets. Individuals in an implemental mindset were less susceptible to the emotion emphasis effect than individuals in a deliberative mindset (Studies 1, 2). By also using an eye-tracking task in Study 2, we demonstrated that our implemental mindset participants’ visual attention was more focused—in particular on goal-directed means—than that of the deliberative mindset participants.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/50451/1/Doerflinger_2-fi738tnd8dxf0.pdf"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/50451"/>
    <dc:creator>Gollwitzer, Peter M.</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:title>Emotion emphasis effects in moral judgment are moderated by mindsets</dcterms:title>
    <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/50451/1/Doerflinger_2-fi738tnd8dxf0.pdf"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-08-05T12:35:23Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:contributor>Doerflinger, Johannes</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Doerflinger, Johannes</dc:creator>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Universitätsbibliographie

Ja

Begutachtet

Ja