Accept, distract, or reframe? : An exploratory experimental comparison of strategies for coping with intrusive body image thoughts in anorexia nervosa and body dysmorphic disorder

Lade...
Vorschaubild
Dateien
Hartmann_2-odv2oqtba0lb3.pdf
Hartmann_2-odv2oqtba0lb3.pdfGröße: 433.57 KBDownloads: 249
Datum
2015
Autor:innen
Thomas, Jennifer J.
Greenberg, Jennifer L.
Rosenfield, Elizabeth H.
Wilhelm, Sabine
Herausgeber:innen
Kontakt
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
ArXiv-ID
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Gesperrt bis
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Forschungsvorhaben
Organisationseinheiten
Zeitschriftenheft
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
Psychiatry Research. Elsevier. 2015, 225(3), pp. 643-650. ISSN 0165-1781. eISSN 1872-7123. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.11.031
Zusammenfassung

Negative body image is the hallmark of anorexia nervosa (AN) and body dysmorphic disorder (BDD). One aspect of body image, appearance-related thoughts, have shown to be a major contributor to relapse, thus further investigation of successful treatment strategies targeting these maladaptive thoughts are warranted. The present study tested an acceptance/mindfulness (AC), a cognitive restructuring (CR), and a distraction strategy with regard to their short-term effectiveness of reducing the frequency of thought occurrence and associated outcomes in participants with AN (n=20), BDD (n=21), and healthy controls (HC; n=22). Although all strategies led to a significant reduction of thought frequency, there was no group × strategy interaction effect in their reduction. Positive affect increased in the BDD group through the AC strategy, but decreased in healthy controls. Acceptance of the thought increased in the CR strategy in AN, whereas that strategy seemed to work least for BDD. Healthy controls showed most acceptance when using distraction. Taken together, the study suggests that all strategies might have their benefits and that it might be worthwhile further investigating differential indication of the strategies with regard to diagnosis and individual factors.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
150 Psychologie
Schlagwörter
Body image, Anorexia nervosa, Body dysmorphic disorder, Acceptance, Cognitive restructuring, Distraction
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690HARTMANN, Andrea S., Jennifer J. THOMAS, Jennifer L. GREENBERG, Elizabeth H. ROSENFIELD, Sabine WILHELM, 2015. Accept, distract, or reframe? : An exploratory experimental comparison of strategies for coping with intrusive body image thoughts in anorexia nervosa and body dysmorphic disorder. In: Psychiatry Research. Elsevier. 2015, 225(3), pp. 643-650. ISSN 0165-1781. eISSN 1872-7123. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.11.031
BibTex
@article{Hartmann2015-02-28Accep-55415,
  year={2015},
  doi={10.1016/j.psychres.2014.11.031},
  title={Accept, distract, or reframe? : An exploratory experimental comparison of strategies for coping with intrusive body image thoughts in anorexia nervosa and body dysmorphic disorder},
  number={3},
  volume={225},
  issn={0165-1781},
  journal={Psychiatry Research},
  pages={643--650},
  author={Hartmann, Andrea S. and Thomas, Jennifer J. and Greenberg, Jennifer L. and Rosenfield, Elizabeth H. and Wilhelm, Sabine}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/55415">
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/55415/1/Hartmann_2-odv2oqtba0lb3.pdf"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dc:contributor>Wilhelm, Sabine</dc:contributor>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-10-29T10:35:32Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:contributor>Thomas, Jennifer J.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Greenberg, Jennifer L.</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:title>Accept, distract, or reframe? : An exploratory experimental comparison of strategies for coping with intrusive body image thoughts in anorexia nervosa and body dysmorphic disorder</dcterms:title>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Negative body image is the hallmark of anorexia nervosa (AN) and body dysmorphic disorder (BDD). One aspect of body image, appearance-related thoughts, have shown to be a major contributor to relapse, thus further investigation of successful treatment strategies targeting these maladaptive thoughts are warranted. The present study tested an acceptance/mindfulness (AC), a cognitive restructuring (CR), and a distraction strategy with regard to their short-term effectiveness of reducing the frequency of thought occurrence and associated outcomes in participants with AN (n=20), BDD (n=21), and healthy controls (HC; n=22). Although all strategies led to a significant reduction of thought frequency, there was no group × strategy interaction effect in their reduction. Positive affect increased in the BDD group through the AC strategy, but decreased in healthy controls. Acceptance of the thought increased in the CR strategy in AN, whereas that strategy seemed to work least for BDD. Healthy controls showed most acceptance when using distraction. Taken together, the study suggests that all strategies might have their benefits and that it might be worthwhile further investigating differential indication of the strategies with regard to diagnosis and individual factors.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:creator>Thomas, Jennifer J.</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Greenberg, Jennifer L.</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Hartmann, Andrea S.</dc:contributor>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/55415/1/Hartmann_2-odv2oqtba0lb3.pdf"/>
    <dc:creator>Hartmann, Andrea S.</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Rosenfield, Elizabeth H.</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:issued>2015-02-28</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:creator>Wilhelm, Sabine</dc:creator>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-10-29T10:35:32Z</dc:date>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/55415"/>
    <dc:creator>Rosenfield, Elizabeth H.</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.
Prüfdatum der URL
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Nein
Begutachtet
Ja
Diese Publikation teilen