Introduction to the Special Issue: European Contributions to Strong Reflexivity

Kuehner, Angela; Ploder, Andrea; Langer, Phil C.

Introduction to the Special Issue: European Contributions to Strong Reflexivity

Dateien

Kuehner_2-qj2548wgfq6r3.pdfGröße: 92.72 KBDownloads: 411

Datum

2016

Autor:innen

Kuehner, Angela

Ploder, Andrea

Langer, Phil C.

Open Access-Veröffentlichung

Open Access Green

Sammlungen

Soziologie

Publikationstyp

Zeitschriftenartikel

Publikationsstatus

Published

Erschienen in

Qualitative Inquiry. Sage Publications. 2016, 22(9), pp. 699-704. ISSN 1077-8004. eISSN 1552-7565. Available under: doi: 10.1177/1077800416658069

Zusammenfassung

This special issue is devoted to reflexivity as an epistemic tool in qualitative research. We suggest a distinction between epistemically weak and epistemically strong reflexivity and present examples for strongly reflexive research from the German-speaking countries and the United Kingdom. The issue pursues three major goals: First, it provides a vocabulary to deepen the discussion about the epistemic dimensions of reflexivity. Second, it intervenes in hegemonic discourses on the “threat of subjectivity” and shows that approaches often perceived as “more subjective” and therefore less valid use, in fact, an epistemically stronger concept of reflexivity. Third, it offers insight into some innovative areas of strongly reflexive research in Europe. A comparison of these methodologies shows that the use of reflexivity as an epistemic tool is compatible with a wide range of approaches.

Fachgebiet (DDC)

300 Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie

Schlagwörter

critical theory, epistemology, Europe, reflexivity, subjectivity

Zitieren

ISO 690

KUEHNER, Angela, Andrea PLODER, Phil C. LANGER, 2016. Introduction to the Special Issue: European Contributions to Strong Reflexivity. In: Qualitative Inquiry. Sage Publications. 2016, 22(9), pp. 699-704. ISSN 1077-8004. eISSN 1552-7565. Available under: doi: 10.1177/1077800416658069

BibTex

@article{Kuehner2016Intro-53370,
  year={2016},
  doi={10.1177/1077800416658069},
  title={Introduction to the Special Issue: European Contributions to Strong Reflexivity},
  number={9},
  volume={22},
  issn={1077-8004},
  journal={Qualitative Inquiry},
  pages={699--704},
  author={Kuehner, Angela and Ploder, Andrea and Langer, Phil C.}
}

RDF

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/53370">
    <dc:creator>Kuehner, Angela</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Ploder, Andrea</dc:contributor>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dc:contributor>Kuehner, Angela</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Langer, Phil C.</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:issued>2016</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:title>Introduction to the Special Issue: European Contributions to Strong Reflexivity</dcterms:title>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This special issue is devoted to reflexivity as an epistemic tool in qualitative research. We suggest a distinction between epistemically weak and epistemically strong reflexivity and present examples for strongly reflexive research from the German-speaking countries and the United Kingdom. The issue pursues three major goals: First, it provides a vocabulary to deepen the discussion about the epistemic dimensions of reflexivity. Second, it intervenes in hegemonic discourses on the “threat of subjectivity” and shows that approaches often perceived as “more subjective” and therefore less valid use, in fact, an epistemically stronger concept of reflexivity. Third, it offers insight into some innovative areas of strongly reflexive research in Europe. A comparison of these methodologies shows that the use of reflexivity as an epistemic tool is compatible with a wide range of approaches.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/34"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:creator>Ploder, Andrea</dc:creator>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/53370/1/Kuehner_2-qj2548wgfq6r3.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/34"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-04-12T14:01:55Z</dc:date>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/53370"/>
    <dc:creator>Langer, Phil C.</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/53370/1/Kuehner_2-qj2548wgfq6r3.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-04-12T14:01:55Z</dcterms:available>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Universitätsbibliographie

Nein

Begutachtet

Ja