Is This Within Reach? : Left but Not Right Brain Damage Affects Affordance Judgment Tendencies

Lade...
Vorschaubild
Dateien
Randerath_2-r16446xhokk52.pdf
Randerath_2-r16446xhokk52.pdfGröße: 2.19 MBDownloads: 184
Datum
2021
Autor:innen
Shigaki, Cheryl
Burris, Joe
Nanda, Ashish
Hwang, Peter
Frey, Scott H.
Herausgeber:innen
Kontakt
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
ArXiv-ID
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
European Union (EU): 291784
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Gold
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Gesperrt bis
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Forschungsvorhaben
Organisationseinheiten
Zeitschriftenheft
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. Frontiers Research Foundation. 2021, 14, 531893. eISSN 1662-5161. Available under: doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.531893
Zusammenfassung

The ability to judge accurately whether or not an action can be accomplished successfully is critical for selecting appropriate response options that enable adaptive behaviors. Such affordance judgments are thought to rely on the perceived fit between environmental properties and knowledge of one's current physical capabilities. Little, however, is currently known about the ability of individuals to judge their own affordances following a stroke, or about the underlying neural mechanisms involved. To address these issues, we employed a signal detection approach to investigate the impact of left or right hemisphere injuries on judgments of whether a visual object was located within reach while remaining still (i.e., reachability). Regarding perceptual sensitivity and accuracy in judging reachability, there were no significant group differences between healthy controls (N = 29), right brain damaged (RBD, N = 17) and left brain damaged stroke patients (LBD, N = 17). However, while healthy controls and RBD patients demonstrated a negative response criterion and thus overestimated their reach capability, LBD patients' average response criterion converged to zero, indicating no judgment tendency. Critically, the LBD group's judgment tendency pattern is consistent with previous findings in this same sample on an affordance judgment task that required estimating whether the hand can fit through apertures (Randerath et al., 2018). Lesion analysis suggests that this loss of judgment tendency may be associated with damage to the left insula, the left parietal and middle temporal lobe. Based on these results, we propose that damage to the left ventro-dorsal stream disrupts the retrieval and processing of a stable criterion, leading to stronger reliance on intact on-line body-perceptive processes computed within the preserved bilateral dorsal network.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
150 Psychologie
Schlagwörter
stroke, perception action, affordances, lesion analysis, reachability, decision making
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690RANDERATH, Jennifer, Lisa FINKEL, Cheryl SHIGAKI, Joe BURRIS, Ashish NANDA, Peter HWANG, Scott H. FREY, 2021. Is This Within Reach? : Left but Not Right Brain Damage Affects Affordance Judgment Tendencies. In: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. Frontiers Research Foundation. 2021, 14, 531893. eISSN 1662-5161. Available under: doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.531893
BibTex
@article{Randerath2021Withi-52758,
  year={2021},
  doi={10.3389/fnhum.2020.531893},
  title={Is This Within Reach? : Left but Not Right Brain Damage Affects Affordance Judgment Tendencies},
  volume={14},
  journal={Frontiers in Human Neuroscience},
  author={Randerath, Jennifer and Finkel, Lisa and Shigaki, Cheryl and Burris, Joe and Nanda, Ashish and Hwang, Peter and Frey, Scott H.},
  note={Article Number: 531893}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/52758">
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dc:contributor>Randerath, Jennifer</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Frey, Scott H.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dc:creator>Finkel, Lisa</dc:creator>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/52758/1/Randerath_2-r16446xhokk52.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2021</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:contributor>Shigaki, Cheryl</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:title>Is This Within Reach? : Left but Not Right Brain Damage Affects Affordance Judgment Tendencies</dcterms:title>
    <dc:contributor>Burris, Joe</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Nanda, Ashish</dc:contributor>
    <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <dc:creator>Hwang, Peter</dc:creator>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-02-08T14:46:10Z</dc:date>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/52758"/>
    <dc:creator>Nanda, Ashish</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Burris, Joe</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Frey, Scott H.</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Shigaki, Cheryl</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Hwang, Peter</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Randerath, Jennifer</dc:creator>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/52758/1/Randerath_2-r16446xhokk52.pdf"/>
    <dc:contributor>Finkel, Lisa</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-02-08T14:46:10Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The ability to judge accurately whether or not an action can be accomplished successfully is critical for selecting appropriate response options that enable adaptive behaviors. Such affordance judgments are thought to rely on the perceived fit between environmental properties and knowledge of one's current physical capabilities. Little, however, is currently known about the ability of individuals to judge their own affordances following a stroke, or about the underlying neural mechanisms involved. To address these issues, we employed a signal detection approach to investigate the impact of left or right hemisphere injuries on judgments of whether a visual object was located within reach while remaining still (i.e., reachability). Regarding perceptual sensitivity and accuracy in judging reachability, there were no significant group differences between healthy controls (N = 29), right brain damaged (RBD, N = 17) and left brain damaged stroke patients (LBD, N = 17). However, while healthy controls and RBD patients demonstrated a negative response criterion and thus overestimated their reach capability, LBD patients' average response criterion converged to zero, indicating no judgment tendency. Critically, the LBD group's judgment tendency pattern is consistent with previous findings in this same sample on an affordance judgment task that required estimating whether the hand can fit through apertures (Randerath et al., 2018). Lesion analysis suggests that this loss of judgment tendency may be associated with damage to the left insula, the left parietal and middle temporal lobe. Based on these results, we propose that damage to the left ventro-dorsal stream disrupts the retrieval and processing of a stable criterion, leading to stronger reliance on intact on-line body-perceptive processes computed within the preserved bilateral dorsal network.</dcterms:abstract>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.
Prüfdatum der URL
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Ja
Diese Publikation teilen