Why Visualize? : Untangling a Large Network of Arguments

Lade...
Vorschaubild
Dateien
Streeb_2-rgjcpzqxaezk4.pdf
Streeb_2-rgjcpzqxaezk4.pdfGröße: 5.11 MBDownloads: 764
Datum
2021
Herausgeber:innen
Kontakt
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
ArXiv-ID
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Gesperrt bis
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Forschungsvorhaben
Organisationseinheiten
Zeitschriftenheft
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). 2021, 27(3), pp. 2220-2236. ISSN 1077-2626. eISSN 1941-0506. Available under: doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2019.2940026
Zusammenfassung

Visualization has been deemed a useful technique by researchers and practitioners, alike, leaving a trail of arguments behind that reason why visualization works. In addition, examples of misleading usages of visualizations in information communication have occasionally been pointed out. Thus, to contribute to the fundamental understanding of our discipline, we require a comprehensive collection of arguments on "why visualize?" (or "why not?"), untangling the rationale behind positive and negative viewpoints. In this paper, we report a theoretical study to understand the underlying reasons of various arguments; their relationships (e.g., built-on, and conflict); and their respective dependencies on tasks, users, and data. We curated an argumentative network based on a collection of arguments from various fields, including information visualization, cognitive science, psychology, statistics, philosophy, and others. Our work proposes several categorizations for the arguments, and makes their relations explicit. We contribute the first comprehensive and systematic theoretical study of the arguments on visualization. Thereby, we provide a roadmap towards building a foundation for visualization theory and empirical research as well as for practical application in the critique and design of visualizations. In addition, we provide our argumentation network and argument collection online at https://whyvis.dbvis.de, supported by an interactive visualization.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
004 Informatik
Schlagwörter
Visualization, Theory, Argument Network, Cognition, Design
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690STREEB, Dirk, Mennatallah EL-ASSADY, Daniel A. KEIM, Min CHEN, 2021. Why Visualize? : Untangling a Large Network of Arguments. In: IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). 2021, 27(3), pp. 2220-2236. ISSN 1077-2626. eISSN 1941-0506. Available under: doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2019.2940026
BibTex
@article{Streeb2021-03Visua-47014,
  year={2021},
  doi={10.1109/TVCG.2019.2940026},
  title={Why Visualize? : Untangling a Large Network of Arguments},
  number={3},
  volume={27},
  issn={1077-2626},
  journal={IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics},
  pages={2220--2236},
  author={Streeb, Dirk and El-Assady, Mennatallah and Keim, Daniel A. and Chen, Min}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/47014">
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-09-24T09:43:48Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/36"/>
    <dc:contributor>Streeb, Dirk</dc:contributor>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:title>Why Visualize? : Untangling a Large Network of Arguments</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Visualization has been deemed a useful technique by researchers and practitioners, alike, leaving a trail of arguments behind that reason why visualization works. In addition, examples of misleading usages of visualizations in information communication have occasionally been pointed out. Thus, to contribute to the fundamental understanding of our discipline, we require a comprehensive collection of arguments on "why visualize?" (or "why not?"), untangling the rationale behind positive and negative viewpoints. In this paper, we report a theoretical study to understand the underlying reasons of various arguments; their relationships (e.g., built-on, and conflict); and their respective dependencies on tasks, users, and data. We curated an argumentative network based on a collection of arguments from various fields, including information visualization, cognitive science, psychology, statistics, philosophy, and others. Our work proposes several categorizations for the arguments, and makes their relations explicit. We contribute the first comprehensive and systematic theoretical study of the arguments on visualization. Thereby, we provide a roadmap towards building a foundation for visualization theory and empirical research as well as for practical application in the critique and design of visualizations. In addition, we provide our argumentation network and argument collection online at https://whyvis.dbvis.de, supported by an interactive visualization.</dcterms:abstract>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/47014"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:creator>Keim, Daniel A.</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Chen, Min</dc:contributor>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/47014/1/Streeb_2-rgjcpzqxaezk4.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2021-03</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:creator>El-Assady, Mennatallah</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Streeb, Dirk</dc:creator>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/36"/>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/47014/1/Streeb_2-rgjcpzqxaezk4.pdf"/>
    <dc:contributor>Keim, Daniel A.</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-09-24T09:43:48Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>Chen, Min</dc:creator>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:contributor>El-Assady, Mennatallah</dc:contributor>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.
Prüfdatum der URL
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Ja
Diese Publikation teilen