Social compensation, retraining, shorter working hours? : Citizen’s social policy priorities for the age of automation
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Robotization, automation and digitalization are transforming labor markets around the globe– more than ever now that a pandemic has shown that our economy is fragile and dependent on specific, often unrecognized jobs. What do citizens expect from their governments in response? Our study of 24 OECD countries shows deep concerns about tech-related job risks. But technological change also raises many positive expectations. Education and training measures for those affected by tech-related change are greeted with widespread approval. Disadvantaged workers, however, would prefer short-term compensations for the potential loss of their jobs. Governments are advised to strike a balance between making social investments in the digital knowledge economy and awarding social transfers.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
BUSEMEYER, Marius R., Tobias TOBER, 2021. Social compensation, retraining, shorter working hours? : Citizen’s social policy priorities for the age of automationBibTex
@techreport{Busemeyer2021Socia-55181, year={2021}, series={Policy Papers / Cluster of Excellence 'The Politics of Inequality'}, title={Social compensation, retraining, shorter working hours? : Citizen’s social policy priorities for the age of automation}, number={08}, url={https://www.progressives-zentrum.org/social-compensation-retraining-shorter-working-hours-citizens-social-policy-priorities-for-the-age-of-automation/?lang=en}, author={Busemeyer, Marius R. and Tober, Tobias} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/55181"> <dc:creator>Tober, Tobias</dc:creator> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/55181"/> <dcterms:title>Social compensation, retraining, shorter working hours? : Citizen’s social policy priorities for the age of automation</dcterms:title> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dc:creator>Busemeyer, Marius R.</dc:creator> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43613"/> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/55181/1/Busemeyer_2-rnmk8cdmve6f2.pdf"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-10-07T09:56:49Z</dc:date> <dcterms:issued>2021</dcterms:issued> <dc:contributor>Busemeyer, Marius R.</dc:contributor> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43613"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/55181/1/Busemeyer_2-rnmk8cdmve6f2.pdf"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-10-07T09:56:49Z</dcterms:available> <dc:contributor>Tober, Tobias</dc:contributor> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Robotization, automation and digitalization are transforming labor markets around the globe– more than ever now that a pandemic has shown that our economy is fragile and dependent on specific, often unrecognized jobs. What do citizens expect from their governments in response? Our study of 24 OECD countries shows deep concerns about tech-related job risks. But technological change also raises many positive expectations. Education and training measures for those affected by tech-related change are greeted with widespread approval. Disadvantaged workers, however, would prefer short-term compensations for the potential loss of their jobs. Governments are advised to strike a balance between making social investments in the digital knowledge economy and awarding social transfers.</dcterms:abstract> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>