A Study on Hume's Theory of Justice : Evolution, Utilitarianism, and the Social Contract

Lade...
Vorschaubild
Dateien
Fior-Mota-de-Andrade_2-v9mugxliogo28.pdf
Fior-Mota-de-Andrade_2-v9mugxliogo28.pdfGröße: 1.51 MBDownloads: 764
Datum
2020
Herausgeber:innen
Kontakt
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Gesperrt bis
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Forschungsvorhaben
Organisationseinheiten
Zeitschriftenheft
Publikationstyp
Dissertation
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung

This study aims to provide the correct interpretation of Hume’s theory of justice. The study on the nature of justice is of the utmost importance for comprehending Hume’s moral philosophy, for I argue that the virtue of justice is the central concept of his moral theory. In this sense, any plausible interpretation of this moral theory must take into account the nature of the virtue of justice as a priority in Hume. In the tradition, Hume scholars have come up with three main lines of interpretation of Hume’s theory of justice: i) the evolutionary interpretation, ii) the rule-utilitarian interpretation, and iii) the contractarian interpretation. Each of these lines of interpretation emphasizes a particular perspective adopted by Hume to explain the virtue of justice in his theory. And each of the three lines of interpretation makes some plausible points and relevant contributions to a better comprehension of the different parts of Hume’s theory of justice. To settle the interpretative dispute between the three lines of interpretation of Hume’s theory of justice, I assess them by their degrees of plausibility in face of the textual evidence in Hume’s work. In this way, I attempt to develop a correct interpretation of Hume’s theory of justice from the most plausible line of interpretation ascertained by this study.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
100 Philosophie
Schlagwörter
Hume, Theory of Justice, Evolution, Utilitarianism, Contractarianism
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690FIOR MOTA DE ANDRADE, Pedro, 2020. A Study on Hume's Theory of Justice : Evolution, Utilitarianism, and the Social Contract [Dissertation]. Konstanz: University of Konstanz
BibTex
@phdthesis{FiorMotadeAndrade2020Study-50538,
  year={2020},
  title={A Study on Hume's Theory of Justice : Evolution, Utilitarianism, and the Social Contract},
  author={Fior Mota de Andrade, Pedro},
  address={Konstanz},
  school={Universität Konstanz}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/50538">
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-08-20T07:22:45Z</dc:date>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dc:creator>Fior Mota de Andrade, Pedro</dc:creator>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/50538/3/Fior-Mota-de-Andrade_2-v9mugxliogo28.pdf"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:issued>2020</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/50538/3/Fior-Mota-de-Andrade_2-v9mugxliogo28.pdf"/>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-08-20T07:22:45Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:title>A Study on Hume's Theory of Justice : Evolution, Utilitarianism, and the Social Contract</dcterms:title>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/50538"/>
    <dc:contributor>Fior Mota de Andrade, Pedro</dc:contributor>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This study aims to provide the correct interpretation of Hume’s theory of justice. The study on the nature of justice is of the utmost importance for comprehending Hume’s moral philosophy, for I argue that the virtue of justice is the central concept of his moral theory. In this sense, any plausible interpretation of this moral theory must take into account the nature of the virtue of justice as a priority in Hume. In the tradition, Hume scholars have come up with three main lines of interpretation of Hume’s theory of justice: i) the evolutionary interpretation, ii) the rule-utilitarian interpretation, and iii) the contractarian interpretation. Each of these lines of interpretation emphasizes a particular perspective adopted by Hume to explain the virtue of justice in his theory. And each of the three lines of interpretation makes some plausible points and relevant contributions to a better comprehension of the different parts of Hume’s theory of justice. To settle the interpretative dispute between the three lines of interpretation of Hume’s theory of justice, I assess them by their degrees of plausibility in face of the textual evidence in Hume’s work. In this way, I attempt to develop a correct interpretation of Hume’s theory of justice from the most plausible line of interpretation ascertained by this study.</dcterms:abstract>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.
Prüfdatum der URL
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
July 10, 2020
Hochschulschriftenvermerk
Konstanz, Univ., Diss., 2020
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen