Contested Implementation : The Unilateral Influence of Member States on Peacebuilding Policy in Kosovo

Eckhard, Steffen; Dijkstra, Hylke

Contested Implementation : The Unilateral Influence of Member States on Peacebuilding Policy in Kosovo

Dateien

Eckhard_2-vnuk23n32t936.pdfGröße: 587.61 KBDownloads: 457

Datum

2017

Autor:innen

Eckhard, Steffen

Dijkstra, Hylke

Open Access-Veröffentlichung

Open Access Hybrid

Sammlungen

Politik- und Verwaltungswissenschaft

Publikationstyp

Zeitschriftenartikel

Publikationsstatus

Published

Erschienen in

Global Policy. 2017, 8(S5), pp. 102-112. ISSN 1758-5880. eISSN 1758-5899. Available under: doi: 10.1111/1758-5899.12455

Zusammenfassung

International organizations play an important role in policy implementation. As member states do not necessarily resolve polit- ical disagreements before delegating tasks, this article focuses on how individual member states seek to in fl uence policy implementation by international organizations. It argues that the institutional context in which delegation takes place affects the opportunities for such unilateral in fl uence. Particularly when the agent has considerable autonomy, implementation is likely to be a contested process. The article presents evidence on the implementation of peacebuilding policy by three inter- national organizations in Kosovo after independence in 2008. Despite the fact that the member states within the UN, OSCE and EU fundamentally disagree on the legal status of Kosovo, the organizations have deployed substantial peacebuilding mis- sions. The UN, OSCE and EU have, however, different institutional designs: implementing agents in the UN and OSCE have, by default, more autonomy than those in the EU. We analogously observe variation in how and to what extent member states exert unilateral in fl uence during implementation of peacebuilding policy on the ground in Kosovo.

Fachgebiet (DDC)

320 Politik

Zitieren

ISO 690

ECKHARD, Steffen, Hylke DIJKSTRA, 2017. Contested Implementation : The Unilateral Influence of Member States on Peacebuilding Policy in Kosovo. In: Global Policy. 2017, 8(S5), pp. 102-112. ISSN 1758-5880. eISSN 1758-5899. Available under: doi: 10.1111/1758-5899.12455

BibTex

@article{Eckhard2017-08-24Conte-45475,
  year={2017},
  doi={10.1111/1758-5899.12455},
  title={Contested Implementation : The Unilateral Influence of Member States on Peacebuilding Policy in Kosovo},
  number={S5},
  volume={8},
  issn={1758-5880},
  journal={Global Policy},
  pages={102--112},
  author={Eckhard, Steffen and Dijkstra, Hylke}
}

RDF

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45475">
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:title>Contested Implementation : The Unilateral Influence of Member States on Peacebuilding Policy in Kosovo</dcterms:title>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/45475/3/Eckhard_2-vnuk23n32t936.pdf"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2017-08-24</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/45475/3/Eckhard_2-vnuk23n32t936.pdf"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/45475"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-03-14T14:10:51Z</dc:date>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">International organizations play an important role in policy implementation. As member states do not necessarily resolve polit- ical disagreements before delegating tasks, this article focuses on how individual member states seek to in fl uence policy implementation by international organizations. It argues that the institutional context in which delegation takes place affects the opportunities for such unilateral in fl uence. Particularly when the agent has considerable autonomy, implementation is likely to be a contested process. The article presents evidence on the implementation of peacebuilding policy by three inter- national organizations in Kosovo after independence in 2008. Despite the fact that the member states within the UN, OSCE and EU fundamentally disagree on the legal status of Kosovo, the organizations have deployed substantial peacebuilding mis- sions. The UN, OSCE and EU have, however, different institutional designs: implementing agents in the UN and OSCE have, by default, more autonomy than those in the EU. We analogously observe variation in how and to what extent member states exert unilateral in fl uence during implementation of peacebuilding policy on the ground in Kosovo.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <dc:creator>Eckhard, Steffen</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-03-14T14:10:51Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:contributor>Eckhard, Steffen</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>Dijkstra, Hylke</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Dijkstra, Hylke</dc:contributor>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Universitätsbibliographie

Nein

Begutachtet

Ja