Algorithm appreciation or aversion? : Comparing in-service and pre-service teachers’ acceptance of computerized expert models

Lade...
Vorschaubild
Dateien
Kaufmann_2-x8i85cpagulz9.pdf
Kaufmann_2-x8i85cpagulz9.pdfGröße: 1.81 MBDownloads: 144
Datum
2021
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
Kontakt
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
ArXiv-ID
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Gold
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Gesperrt bis
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Forschungsvorhaben
Organisationseinheiten
Zeitschriftenheft
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. Elsevier. 2021, 2, 100028. eISSN 2666-920X. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100028
Zusammenfassung

Although computerized expert models (i.e., algorithms) could improve educational decisions and judgments, initial research has demonstrated that teachers, like other professional groups, tend to be “algorithm averse.” In the current study, we use behavioral and questionnaire data to examine the extent to which in-service and pre-service (i.e., students in training to become) teachers accept advice from expert models and investigate how teachers' acceptance of expert models could be improved. Although it is often presumed that younger generations are less algorithm averse, we demonstrate that both in-service and pre-service teachers prefer advice from a human source (school counselor) than from an expert model, to a similar extent. Furthermore, we find that advice acceptance depends on the difficulty of the decision task, but we find no evidence that pre-service teachers’ acceptance of computerized advice depends on their numeracy or the Big Five traits of openness and neuroticism. Finally, we find that in-service teachers lacked knowledge of computerized expert models but indicated that advice from expert models would be superior to human advice in certain kinds of tasks. Our results indicate that both in- and pre-service teachers could profit from training about the definition and value of computerized expert models, and we provide suggestions for training and future research.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
150 Psychologie
Schlagwörter
Artificial intelligence, Digitalization, Algorithm acceptance, Teacher education, Pre-service teachers
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690KAUFMANN, Esther, 2021. Algorithm appreciation or aversion? : Comparing in-service and pre-service teachers’ acceptance of computerized expert models. In: Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. Elsevier. 2021, 2, 100028. eISSN 2666-920X. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100028
BibTex
@article{Kaufmann2021Algor-56560,
  year={2021},
  doi={10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100028},
  title={Algorithm appreciation or aversion? : Comparing in-service and pre-service teachers’ acceptance of computerized expert models},
  volume={2},
  journal={Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence},
  author={Kaufmann, Esther},
  note={Article Number: 100028}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/56560">
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dc:contributor>Kaufmann, Esther</dc:contributor>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-02-15T09:31:50Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/56560/1/Kaufmann_2-x8i85cpagulz9.pdf"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:creator>Kaufmann, Esther</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:issued>2021</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Although computerized expert models (i.e., algorithms) could improve educational decisions and judgments, initial research has demonstrated that teachers, like other professional groups, tend to be “algorithm averse.” In the current study, we use behavioral and questionnaire data to examine the extent to which in-service and pre-service (i.e., students in training to become) teachers accept advice from expert models and investigate how teachers' acceptance of expert models could be improved. Although it is often presumed that younger generations are less algorithm averse, we demonstrate that both in-service and pre-service teachers prefer advice from a human source (school counselor) than from an expert model, to a similar extent. Furthermore, we find that advice acceptance depends on the difficulty of the decision task, but we find no evidence that pre-service teachers’ acceptance of computerized advice depends on their numeracy or the Big Five traits of openness and neuroticism. Finally, we find that in-service teachers lacked knowledge of computerized expert models but indicated that advice from expert models would be superior to human advice in certain kinds of tasks. Our results indicate that both in- and pre-service teachers could profit from training about the definition and value of computerized expert models, and we provide suggestions for training and future research.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:title>Algorithm appreciation or aversion? : Comparing in-service and pre-service teachers’ acceptance of computerized expert models</dcterms:title>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-02-15T09:31:50Z</dc:date>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/56560"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/56560/1/Kaufmann_2-x8i85cpagulz9.pdf"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.
Prüfdatum der URL
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Ja
Diese Publikation teilen