Software Evaluation using the 9241 Evaluator

Oppermann, Reinhard; Reiterer, Harald

Software Evaluation using the 9241 Evaluator

Dateien

Oppermann_251684.pdfGröße: 1012.73 KBDownloads: 640

Datum

1997

Autor:innen

Oppermann, Reinhard

Reiterer, Harald

Open Access-Veröffentlichung

Open Access Green

Sammlungen

Informatik und Informationswissenschaft

Publikationstyp

Zeitschriftenartikel

Publikationsstatus

Published

Erschienen in

Behaviour & Information Technology. 1997, 16(4-5), pp. 232-245. ISSN 0144-929X. eISSN 1362-3001. Available under: doi: 10.1080/014492997119815

Zusammenfassung

There is an increasing need for practical and comprehensive evaluation methods and tools for conformance testing with ISO standards. In this study, we focus on ISO 9241 which is an important ergonomic standard. A brief description shows its content and structure. Practical evaluations include the amount of time and resources which must be managed in software projects, while comprehensive evaluations require that the context of use be considered during the evaluation of user interfaces. In order to complete a comprehensive evaluation of usability, it is necessary to use more than one evaluation method. Therefore, an overview of different evaluation approaches is given, describing their advantages and disadvantages. Finally, the ISO 9241 Evaluator is presented in detail as an example of a practical expert-based evaluation method for conformance testing with the ISO 9241 standard, that can be integrated in a comprehensive evaluation approach.

Fachgebiet (DDC)

004 Informatik

Zitieren

ISO 690

OPPERMANN, Reinhard, Harald REITERER, 1997. Software Evaluation using the 9241 Evaluator. In: Behaviour & Information Technology. 1997, 16(4-5), pp. 232-245. ISSN 0144-929X. eISSN 1362-3001. Available under: doi: 10.1080/014492997119815

BibTex

@article{Oppermann1997Softw-25168,
  year={1997},
  doi={10.1080/014492997119815},
  title={Software Evaluation using the 9241 Evaluator},
  number={4-5},
  volume={16},
  issn={0144-929X},
  journal={Behaviour & Information Technology},
  pages={232--245},
  author={Oppermann, Reinhard and Reiterer, Harald}
}

RDF

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/25168">
    <dc:contributor>Oppermann, Reinhard</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:issued>1997</dcterms:issued>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/25168/1/Oppermann_251684.pdf"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/25168"/>
    <dc:creator>Reiterer, Harald</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:title>Software Evaluation using the 9241 Evaluator</dcterms:title>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/25168/1/Oppermann_251684.pdf"/>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2013-11-19T12:39:25Z</dc:date>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/36"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Reiterer, Harald</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">There is an increasing need for practical and comprehensive evaluation methods and tools for conformance testing with ISO standards. In this study, we focus on ISO 9241 which is an important ergonomic standard. A brief description shows its content and structure. Practical evaluations include the amount of time and resources which must be managed in software projects, while comprehensive evaluations require that the context of use be considered during the evaluation of user interfaces. In order to complete a comprehensive evaluation of usability, it is necessary to use more than one evaluation method. Therefore, an overview of different evaluation approaches is given, describing their advantages and disadvantages. Finally, the ISO 9241 Evaluator is presented in detail as an example of a practical expert-based evaluation method for conformance testing with the ISO 9241 standard, that can be integrated in a comprehensive evaluation approach.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/36"/>
    <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>Behaviour &amp; Information Technology ; 16 (1997), 4-5. - S. 232-245</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2013-11-19T12:39:25Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:creator>Oppermann, Reinhard</dc:creator>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Universitätsbibliographie

Nein