Shocking Revelations and Saccharin Sweetness in the Study of Drosophila Olfactory Memory

Perisse, Emmanuel; Burke, Christopher; Huetteroth, Wolf; Waddell, Scott

Shocking Revelations and Saccharin Sweetness in the Study of Drosophila Olfactory Memory

Dateien

Perisse_288989.pdfGröße: 971.06 KBDownloads: 263

Datum

2013

Autor:innen

Perisse, Emmanuel

Burke, Christopher

Huetteroth, Wolf

Waddell, Scott

Open Access-Veröffentlichung

Open Access Gold

Sammlungen

Biologie
Zukunftskolleg

Publikationstyp

Zeitschriftenartikel

Publikationsstatus

Published

Erschienen in

Current Biology. 2013, 23(17), pp. R752-R763. ISSN 0960-9822. eISSN 1879-0445. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.07.060

Zusammenfassung

It is now almost forty years since the first description of learning in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Various incarnations of the classic mutagenesis approach envisaged in the early days have provided around one hundred learning defective mutant fly strains. Recent technological advances permit temporal control of neural function in the behaving fly. These approaches have radically changed experiments in the field and have provided a neural circuit perspective of memory formation, consolidation and retrieval. Combining neural perturbations with more classical mutant intervention allows investigators to interrogate the molecular and cellular processes of memory within the defined neural circuits. Here, we summarize some of the progress made in the last ten years that indicates a remarkable conservation of the neural mechanisms of memory formation between flies and mammals. We emphasize that considering an ethologically-relevant viewpoint might provide additional experimental power in studies of Drosophila memory.

Fachgebiet (DDC)

570 Biowissenschaften, Biologie

Zitieren

ISO 690

PERISSE, Emmanuel, Christopher BURKE, Wolf HUETTEROTH, Scott WADDELL, 2013. Shocking Revelations and Saccharin Sweetness in the Study of Drosophila Olfactory Memory. In: Current Biology. 2013, 23(17), pp. R752-R763. ISSN 0960-9822. eISSN 1879-0445. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.07.060

BibTex

@article{Perisse2013-09-09Shock-28898,
  year={2013},
  doi={10.1016/j.cub.2013.07.060},
  title={Shocking Revelations and Saccharin Sweetness in the Study of Drosophila Olfactory Memory},
  number={17},
  volume={23},
  issn={0960-9822},
  journal={Current Biology},
  pages={R752--R763},
  author={Perisse, Emmanuel and Burke, Christopher and Huetteroth, Wolf and Waddell, Scott}
}

RDF

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28898">
    <dc:contributor>Waddell, Scott</dc:contributor>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/28898/2/Perisse_288989.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <dc:creator>Perisse, Emmanuel</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:issued>2013-09-09</dcterms:issued>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/28898"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/"/>
    <dc:rights>Attribution 3.0 Unported</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2014-09-05T11:19:45Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2014-09-05T11:19:45Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:title>Shocking Revelations and Saccharin Sweetness in the Study of Drosophila Olfactory Memory</dcterms:title>
    <dc:creator>Burke, Christopher</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Perisse, Emmanuel</dc:contributor>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/52"/>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/28898/2/Perisse_288989.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">It is now almost forty years since the first description of learning in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Various incarnations of the classic mutagenesis approach envisaged in the early days have provided around one hundred learning defective mutant fly strains. Recent technological advances permit temporal control of neural function in the behaving fly. These approaches have radically changed experiments in the field and have provided a neural circuit perspective of memory formation, consolidation and retrieval. Combining neural perturbations with more classical mutant intervention allows investigators to interrogate the molecular and cellular processes of memory within the defined neural circuits. Here, we summarize some of the progress made in the last ten years that indicates a remarkable conservation of the neural mechanisms of memory formation between flies and mammals. We emphasize that considering an ethologically-relevant viewpoint might provide additional experimental power in studies of Drosophila memory.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:creator>Waddell, Scott</dc:creator>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/52"/>
    <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>Current biology ; 23 (2013), 17. - S. R752-R763</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Burke, Christopher</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Huetteroth, Wolf</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Huetteroth, Wolf</dc:creator>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Universitätsbibliographie

Nein