Who Mediates? : The Political Economy of International Conflict Management
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Studies on international mediation have traditionally focused on the effectiveness of international efforts to settle or resolve militarized conflicts. In this article, we start from a different perspective and examine the identity of mediators and the factors determining the choice of mediators. We build an integrative theoretical framework to explain the number of mediation mandates an international actor receives. The hypotheses we derive are subsequently tested in a multivariate event count model using an original dataset on international mediation from 1950 to 1990. The results obtained from Poisson and negative binomial regressions disconfirm the assertion that the effectiveness of a mediator influences the number of mandates it receives. The most important structural force on the international mediation market seems to be the hegemonic status of the USA. The analysis further demonstrates that international conflict management is largely, but not exclusively, restricted to the permanent members of the Security Council of the UN. As the theoretical framework suggests, ideological factors, such as the neutrality of the mediator, play a less significant role on the market for mediation. Democracies equally are not significantly more active than autocracies in the management of international conflicts.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
BERCOVITCH, Jacob, Gerald SCHNEIDER, 2000. Who Mediates? : The Political Economy of International Conflict Management. In: Journal of Peace Research. 2000, 37(2), pp. 145-165. Available under: doi: 10.1177/0022343300037002002BibTex
@article{Bercovitch2000Media-4210,
year={2000},
doi={10.1177/0022343300037002002},
title={Who Mediates? : The Political Economy of International Conflict Management},
number={2},
volume={37},
journal={Journal of Peace Research},
pages={145--165},
author={Bercovitch, Jacob and Schneider, Gerald}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/4210">
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
<dcterms:issued>2000</dcterms:issued>
<dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Studies on international mediation have traditionally focused on the effectiveness of international efforts to settle or resolve militarized conflicts. In this article, we start from a different perspective and examine the identity of mediators and the factors determining the choice of mediators. We build an integrative theoretical framework to explain the number of mediation mandates an international actor receives. The hypotheses we derive are subsequently tested in a multivariate event count model using an original dataset on international mediation from 1950 to 1990. The results obtained from Poisson and negative binomial regressions disconfirm the assertion that the effectiveness of a mediator influences the number of mandates it receives. The most important structural force on the international mediation market seems to be the hegemonic status of the USA. The analysis further demonstrates that international conflict management is largely, but not exclusively, restricted to the permanent members of the Security Council of the UN. As the theoretical framework suggests, ideological factors, such as the neutrality of the mediator, play a less significant role on the market for mediation. Democracies equally are not significantly more active than autocracies in the management of international conflicts.</dcterms:abstract>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-24T10:13:05Z</dc:date>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dc:creator>Bercovitch, Jacob</dc:creator>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/4210/1/bercovitchschneiderjpr2000.pdf"/>
<dc:creator>Schneider, Gerald</dc:creator>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-24T10:13:05Z</dcterms:available>
<dcterms:bibliographicCitation>First publ. in: Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 37, No. 2, 2000, pp. 145-165</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
<dc:contributor>Bercovitch, Jacob</dc:contributor>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/4210"/>
<dcterms:title>Who Mediates? : The Political Economy of International Conflict Management</dcterms:title>
<dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
<dc:contributor>Schneider, Gerald</dc:contributor>
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
<dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/4210/1/bercovitchschneiderjpr2000.pdf"/>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
