Modeling Behavioral Measures of Error Detection in Choice Tasks : Response Monitoring Versus Conflict Monitoring
Dateien
Datum
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
The present study investigated the mechanisms underlying error detection in the error signaling response. The authors tested between a response monitoring account and a conflict monitoring account. By implementing each account within the neural network model of N. Yeung, M. M. Botvinick, and J. D. Cohen (2004), they demonstrated that both accounts make different predictions as to how error signaling performance is influenced by varying the participants response criterion. These predictions were tested in an experiment using the Eriksen-flanker task. The qualitative pattern as well as a model fit favored the response monitoring account, which states that error detection is mediated by detecting internal error corrections.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
STEINHAUSER, Marco, Martin E. MAIER, Ronald HÃœBNER, 2008. Modeling Behavioral Measures of Error Detection in Choice Tasks : Response Monitoring Versus Conflict Monitoring. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2008, 34(1), pp. 158-176. Available under: doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.1.158BibTex
@article{Steinhauser2008Model-10798, year={2008}, doi={10.1037/0096-1523.34.1.158}, title={Modeling Behavioral Measures of Error Detection in Choice Tasks : Response Monitoring Versus Conflict Monitoring}, number={1}, volume={34}, journal={Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance}, pages={158--176}, author={Steinhauser, Marco and Maier, Martin E. and Hübner, Ronald} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/10798"> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/10798/1/Steinhauser_al_08_JEPHPP.pdf"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/10798"/> <dc:creator>Hübner, Ronald</dc:creator> <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>First publ. in: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 34 (2008), 1, pp. 158-176</dcterms:bibliographicCitation> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:title>Modeling Behavioral Measures of Error Detection in Choice Tasks : Response Monitoring Versus Conflict Monitoring</dcterms:title> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format> <dc:contributor>Steinhauser, Marco</dc:contributor> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dc:contributor>Maier, Martin E.</dc:contributor> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dc:creator>Steinhauser, Marco</dc:creator> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-25T09:22:43Z</dc:date> <dcterms:issued>2008</dcterms:issued> <dc:creator>Maier, Martin E.</dc:creator> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/10798/1/Steinhauser_al_08_JEPHPP.pdf"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The present study investigated the mechanisms underlying error detection in the error signaling response. The authors tested between a response monitoring account and a conflict monitoring account. By implementing each account within the neural network model of N. Yeung, M. M. Botvinick, and J. D. Cohen (2004), they demonstrated that both accounts make different predictions as to how error signaling performance is influenced by varying the participants response criterion. These predictions were tested in an experiment using the Eriksen-flanker task. The qualitative pattern as well as a model fit favored the response monitoring account, which states that error detection is mediated by detecting internal error corrections.</dcterms:abstract> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-25T09:22:43Z</dcterms:available> <dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic</dc:rights> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/"/> <dc:contributor>Hübner, Ronald</dc:contributor> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>