Response execution, selection, or activation : what is sufficient for response-related repetition effects under task shifting?

Hübner, Ronald; Druey, Michel D.

Response execution, selection, or activation : what is sufficient for response-related repetition effects under task shifting?

Dateien

Huebner_Druey_06_PsyRes.pdfGröße: 387.17 KBDownloads: 488

Datum

2005

Open Access-Veröffentlichung

Open Access Green

Sammlungen

Psychologie

Publikationstyp

Zeitschriftenartikel

Publikationsstatus

Published

Erschienen in

Psychological Research. 2005, 70(4), pp. 245-261. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s00426-005-0219-8

Zusammenfassung

Repetition effects are often helpful in revealing information about mental structures and processes. Usually, positive effects have been observed when the stimuli or responses are repeated. However, in task shift studies it has also been found that response repetitions can produce negative effects if the task shifts. Although several mechanisms have been proposed to account for this interaction between task shifting and response repetition, many details remain open. Therefore, a series of four experiments was conducted to answer two questions. First, are motor responses necessary to produce response-related repetition effects, or is response activation sufficient? Second, does the risk of an accidental re-execution of the last response affect the repetition costs? The results show that response activation alone can produce repetition effects. Furthermore, the risk of accidental response re-execution largely modulates these effects.

Fachgebiet (DDC)

150 Psychologie

Zitieren

ISO 690

HÜBNER, Ronald, Michel D. DRUEY, 2005. Response execution, selection, or activation : what is sufficient for response-related repetition effects under task shifting?. In: Psychological Research. 2005, 70(4), pp. 245-261. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s00426-005-0219-8

BibTex

@article{Hubner2005Respo-11352,
  year={2005},
  doi={10.1007/s00426-005-0219-8},
  title={Response execution, selection, or activation : what is sufficient for response-related repetition effects under task shifting?},
  number={4},
  volume={70},
  journal={Psychological Research},
  pages={245--261},
  author={Hübner, Ronald and Druey, Michel D.}
}

RDF

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/11352">
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-25T09:27:51Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Repetition effects are often helpful in revealing information about mental structures and processes. Usually, positive effects have been observed when the stimuli or responses are repeated. However, in task shift studies it has also been found that response repetitions can produce negative effects if the task shifts. Although several mechanisms have been proposed to account for this interaction between task shifting and response repetition, many details remain open. Therefore, a series of four experiments was conducted to answer two questions. First, are motor responses necessary to produce response-related repetition effects, or is response activation sufficient? Second, does the risk of an accidental re-execution of the last response affect the repetition costs? The results show that response activation alone can produce repetition effects. Furthermore, the risk of accidental response re-execution largely modulates these effects.</dcterms:abstract>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/11352"/>
    <dcterms:title>Response execution, selection, or activation : what is sufficient for response-related repetition effects under task shifting?</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>First publ. in: Psychological Research 70 (2006), 4, pp. 245 261</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:contributor>Hübner, Ronald</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:issued>2005</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:creator>Hübner, Ronald</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-25T09:27:51Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/11352/1/Huebner_Druey_06_PsyRes.pdf"/>
    <dc:creator>Druey, Michel D.</dc:creator>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic</dc:rights>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/11352/1/Huebner_Druey_06_PsyRes.pdf"/>
    <dc:contributor>Druey, Michel D.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Universitätsbibliographie

Ja