Number of cues influences the cost of remembering to remember

Cohen, Anna-Lisa; Jaudas, Alexander; Gollwitzer, Peter M.

Number of cues influences the cost of remembering to remember

Dateien

Number_of_cues_influences_the_cost_of_remembering_to_remember.pdfGröße: 190.97 KBDownloads: 307

Datum

2008

Open Access-Veröffentlichung

Open Access Green

Sammlungen

Psychologie

Publikationstyp

Zeitschriftenartikel

Publikationsstatus

Published

Erschienen in

Memory & Cognition. 2008, 36(1), pp. 149-156. Available under: doi: 10.3758/MC.36.1.149

Zusammenfassung

A current focus in the prospective memory literature is the extent to which a prospective memory task (remembering to perform a future action) interferes with ongoing activities (defined in this study as lexical decision latencies). In the present study, participants had to detect one, two, three, four, five, or six prospective memory cues. Results showed no significant increase in lexical decision latencies with one or two targets; however, significant costs emerged with three or more targets. Furthermore, task interference showed a linear increase in task costs for word trial performance but not for nonword trial performance. Practical and theoretical implications of these findings are discussed.

Fachgebiet (DDC)

150 Psychologie

Zitieren

ISO 690

COHEN, Anna-Lisa, Alexander JAUDAS, Peter M. GOLLWITZER, 2008. Number of cues influences the cost of remembering to remember. In: Memory & Cognition. 2008, 36(1), pp. 149-156. Available under: doi: 10.3758/MC.36.1.149

BibTex

@article{Cohen2008Numbe-10558,
  year={2008},
  doi={10.3758/MC.36.1.149},
  title={Number of cues influences the cost of remembering to remember},
  number={1},
  volume={36},
  journal={Memory & Cognition},
  pages={149--156},
  author={Cohen, Anna-Lisa and Jaudas, Alexander and Gollwitzer, Peter M.}
}

RDF

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/10558">
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-25T09:19:15Z</dc:date>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/10558/1/Number_of_cues_influences_the_cost_of_remembering_to_remember.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/"/>
    <dc:creator>Cohen, Anna-Lisa</dc:creator>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/10558"/>
    <dc:contributor>Jaudas, Alexander</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:title>Number of cues influences the cost of remembering to remember</dcterms:title>
    <dc:creator>Gollwitzer, Peter M.</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Cohen, Anna-Lisa</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Jaudas, Alexander</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/10558/1/Number_of_cues_influences_the_cost_of_remembering_to_remember.pdf"/>
    <dc:contributor>Gollwitzer, Peter M.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-25T09:19:15Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>First publ. in: Memory &amp; Cognition 36 (2008), 1, pp. 149-156</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">A current focus in the prospective memory literature is the extent to which a prospective memory task (remembering to perform a future action) interferes with ongoing activities (defined in this study as lexical decision latencies). In the present study, participants had to detect one, two, three, four, five, or six prospective memory cues. Results showed no significant increase in lexical decision latencies with one or two targets; however, significant costs emerged with three or more targets. Furthermore, task interference showed a linear increase in task costs for word trial performance but not for nonword trial performance. Practical and theoretical implications of these findings are discussed.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:issued>2008</dcterms:issued>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Universitätsbibliographie

Ja