Ranking Functions, AGM Style

Lade...
Vorschaubild
Dateien
Ranking_Functions.pdf
Ranking_Functions.pdfGröße: 282.83 KBDownloads: 144
Datum
1999
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
Kontakt
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Gesperrt bis
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Forschungsvorhaben
Organisationseinheiten
Zeitschriftenheft
Publikationstyp
Beitrag zu einem Sammelband
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
HANSSON, B., ed. and others. Internet Festschrift for Peter Gärdenfors. Lund, 1999
Zusammenfassung

The paper first points out that ranking functions are superior to AGM belief revision theory in two crucial respects, i.e. in solving the problem of iterated belief revision and in giving an adequate account of doxastic independence (this was indeed why ranking function were developed in No. 15). Second, it shows how ranking functions are uniquely reflected in iterated belief change. More precisely, it specifies conditions on threefold contractions which suffice to represent contractions by a ranking function uniquely up to multiplication by a positive integer (a result independently obtained by Matthias Hild). Thus, an important advantage AGM theory was always claimed to have over ranking functions proves to be spurious.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
100 Philosophie
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690SPOHN, Wolfgang, 1999. Ranking Functions, AGM Style. In: HANSSON, B., ed. and others. Internet Festschrift for Peter Gärdenfors. Lund, 1999
BibTex
@incollection{Spohn1999Ranki-3537,
  year={1999},
  title={Ranking Functions, AGM Style},
  address={Lund},
  booktitle={Internet Festschrift for Peter Gärdenfors},
  editor={Hansson, B.},
  author={Spohn, Wolfgang}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/3537">
    <dc:creator>Spohn, Wolfgang</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:issued>1999</dcterms:issued>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <dcterms:title>Ranking Functions, AGM Style</dcterms:title>
    <dc:contributor>Spohn, Wolfgang</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>First publ. in: Internet Festschrift for Peter Gärdenfors / B. Hansson ... (eds.). - Lund, 1999</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
    <dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="deu">The paper first points out that ranking functions are superior to AGM belief revision theory in two crucial respects, i.e. in solving the problem of iterated belief revision and in giving an adequate account of doxastic independence (this was indeed why ranking function were developed in No. 15). Second, it shows how ranking functions are uniquely reflected in iterated belief change. More precisely, it specifies conditions on threefold contractions which suffice to represent contractions by a ranking function uniquely up to multiplication by a positive integer (a result independently obtained by Matthias Hild). Thus, an important advantage AGM theory was always claimed to have over ranking functions proves to be spurious.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-23T13:46:40Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/3537/1/Ranking_Functions.pdf"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/3537/1/Ranking_Functions.pdf"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/3537"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-23T13:46:40Z</dc:date>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.
Prüfdatum der URL
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Nein
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen