Same menu, seperate tables : the institutionalist turn in political science and the study of European integration

Lade...
Vorschaubild
Dateien
aspinwall_schneider_ejpr_2000.pdf
aspinwall_schneider_ejpr_2000.pdfGröße: 198.17 KBDownloads: 1882
Datum
2000
Autor:innen
Aspinwall, Mark D.
Herausgeber:innen
Kontakt
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
ArXiv-ID
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Gesperrt bis
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Forschungsvorhaben
Organisationseinheiten
Zeitschriftenheft
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
European Journal of Political Research. 2000, 38(1), pp. 1-36. Available under: doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.00526
Zusammenfassung

Recent research on European integration has largely profited from the institutionalist turn in political science. Theoretical progress has, however, been hampered by the diverse understandings of this new research tradition. This paper tries to tackle the conceptual diversity in a positive way. We first analyze the neo-institutionalist turn in political science and European studies and then move on to a detailed analysis and comparison of the three competing approaches sociological, historical, and rational choice institutionalism. Next, we will show that the main differences are as much epistemological as theoretical. A convergence towards a unifying institutionalist approach can thus only be possible if some sort of a methodological convergence takes place. We sketch how a synthesis between the competing schools might appear.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
320 Politik
Schlagwörter
Rational Choice, soziologischer Institutionalismus, Theorievergleich
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690ASPINWALL, Mark D., Gerald SCHNEIDER, 2000. Same menu, seperate tables : the institutionalist turn in political science and the study of European integration. In: European Journal of Political Research. 2000, 38(1), pp. 1-36. Available under: doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.00526
BibTex
@article{Aspinwall2000seper-4020,
  year={2000},
  doi={10.1111/1475-6765.00526},
  title={Same menu, seperate tables : the institutionalist turn in political science and the study of European integration},
  number={1},
  volume={38},
  journal={European Journal of Political Research},
  pages={1--36},
  author={Aspinwall, Mark D. and Schneider, Gerald}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/4020">
    <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>First publ. in: European Journal of Political Research 38 (2000), 1, pp.1-36</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
    <dc:contributor>Aspinwall, Mark D.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dc:creator>Schneider, Gerald</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Recent research on European integration has largely profited from the institutionalist turn in political science. Theoretical progress has, however, been hampered by the diverse understandings of this new research tradition. This paper tries to tackle the conceptual diversity in a positive way. We first analyze the neo-institutionalist turn in political science and European studies and then move on to a detailed analysis and comparison of the three competing approaches   sociological, historical, and rational choice institutionalism. Next, we will show that the main differences are as much epistemological as theoretical. A convergence towards a unifying institutionalist approach can thus only be possible if some sort of a methodological convergence takes place. We sketch how a synthesis between the competing schools might appear.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-24T10:10:02Z</dc:date>
    <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
    <dcterms:title>Same menu, seperate tables : the institutionalist turn in political science and the study of European integration</dcterms:title>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/4020"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-24T10:10:02Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Schneider, Gerald</dc:contributor>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dc:creator>Aspinwall, Mark D.</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/4020/1/aspinwall_schneider_ejpr_2000.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2000</dcterms:issued>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/4020/1/aspinwall_schneider_ejpr_2000.pdf"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.
Prüfdatum der URL
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Nein
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen