Serial or parallel processing in dual tasks : What is more effortful?
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Recent studies indicate that dual tasks can be performed with a serial or parallel strategy and that the parallel strategy is preferred even if this implies performance costs. The present study investigates the hypothesis that parallel processing is favored because it requires less mental effort compared to serial processing. A serial or parallel processing strategy was induced in a sample of28 healthy participants. As measures of mental effort, we used a rating as well as heart rate (HR) and electrodermal activity. Parallel processing again showed performance costs relative to serial, whereas serial processing was judged as more effortful. Also tonic HR and phasic HR deceleration were increased with a serial strategy. Thus the preference for a parallel strategy in dual tasks likely reflects a compromise between optimizing performance and minimizing the amount of mental effort. This aspect is neglected in current dual task accounts so far.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
LEHLE, Carola, Marco STEINHAUSER, Ronald HÃœBNER, 2009. Serial or parallel processing in dual tasks : What is more effortful?. In: Psychophysiology. 2009, 46(3), pp. 502-509. Available under: doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00806.xBibTex
@article{Lehle2009Seria-10618, year={2009}, doi={10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00806.x}, title={Serial or parallel processing in dual tasks : What is more effortful?}, number={3}, volume={46}, journal={Psychophysiology}, pages={502--509}, author={Lehle, Carola and Steinhauser, Marco and Hübner, Ronald} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/10618"> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dc:contributor>Hübner, Ronald</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Lehle, Carola</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Hübner, Ronald</dc:creator> <dcterms:title>Serial or parallel processing in dual tasks : What is more effortful?</dcterms:title> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>First publ. in: Psychophysiology 46 (2009), 3, pp. 502 509</dcterms:bibliographicCitation> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dc:creator>Steinhauser, Marco</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Lehle, Carola</dc:creator> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:issued>2009</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-25T09:20:06Z</dcterms:available> <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-25T09:20:06Z</dc:date> <dc:contributor>Steinhauser, Marco</dc:contributor> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Recent studies indicate that dual tasks can be performed with a serial or parallel strategy and that the parallel strategy is preferred even if this implies performance costs. The present study investigates the hypothesis that parallel processing is favored because it requires less mental effort compared to serial processing. A serial or parallel processing strategy was induced in a sample of28 healthy participants. As measures of mental effort, we used a rating as well as heart rate (HR) and electrodermal activity. Parallel processing again showed performance costs relative to serial, whereas serial processing was judged as more effortful. Also tonic HR and phasic HR deceleration were increased with a serial strategy. Thus the preference for a parallel strategy in dual tasks likely reflects a compromise between optimizing performance and minimizing the amount of mental effort. This aspect is neglected in current dual task accounts so far.</dcterms:abstract> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/10618/1/Serial_or_parallel_processing.pdf"/> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/10618/1/Serial_or_parallel_processing.pdf"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/10618"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>