Compensating for On-Body Placement Effects in Activity Recognition

Kompensation positionsbezogener Artefakte in Aktivitätserkennung

  • This thesis investigates, how placement variations of electronic devices influence the possibility of using sensors integrated in those devices for context recognition. The vast majority of context recognition research assumes well defined, fixed sen- sor locations. Although this might be acceptable for some application domains (e.g. in an industrial setting), users, in general, will have a hard time coping with these limitations. If one needs to remember to carry dedicated sensors and to adjust their orientation from time to time, the activity recognition system is more distracting than helpful. How can we deal with device location and orientation changes to make context sensing mainstream? This thesis presents a systematic evaluation of device placement effects in context recognition. We first deal with detecting if a device is carried on the body or placed somewhere in the environ- ment. If the device is placed on the body, it is useful to know on which body part. We also address how to deal with sensors changing their position andThis thesis investigates, how placement variations of electronic devices influence the possibility of using sensors integrated in those devices for context recognition. The vast majority of context recognition research assumes well defined, fixed sen- sor locations. Although this might be acceptable for some application domains (e.g. in an industrial setting), users, in general, will have a hard time coping with these limitations. If one needs to remember to carry dedicated sensors and to adjust their orientation from time to time, the activity recognition system is more distracting than helpful. How can we deal with device location and orientation changes to make context sensing mainstream? This thesis presents a systematic evaluation of device placement effects in context recognition. We first deal with detecting if a device is carried on the body or placed somewhere in the environ- ment. If the device is placed on the body, it is useful to know on which body part. We also address how to deal with sensors changing their position and their orientation during use. For each of these topics some highlights are given in the following. Regarding environmental placement, we introduce an active sampling ap- proach to infer symbolic object location. This approach requires only simple sensors (acceleration, sound) and no infrastructure setup. The method works for specific placements such as "on the couch", "in the desk drawer" as well as for general location classes, such as "closed wood compartment" or "open iron sur- face". In the experimental evaluation we reach a recognition accuracy of 90% and above over a total of over 1200 measurements from 35 specific locations (taken from 3 different rooms) and 12 abstract location classes. To derive the coarse device placement on the body, we present a method solely based on rotation and acceleration signals from the device. It works independent of the device orientation. The on-body placement recognition rate is around 80% over 4 min. of unconstrained motion data for the worst scenario and up to 90% over a 2 min. interval for the best scenario. We use over 30 hours of motion data for the analysis. Two special issues of device placement are orientation and displacement. This thesis proposes a set of heuristics that significantly increase the robustness of motion sensor-based activity recognition with respect to sen- sor displacement. We show how, within certain limits and with modest quality degradation, motion sensor-based activity recognition can be implemented in a displacement tolerant way. We evaluate our heuristics first on a set of synthetic lower arm motions which are well suited to illustrate the strengths and limits of our approach, then on an extended modes of locomotion problem (sensors on the upper leg) and finally on a set of exercises performed on various gym machines (sensors placed on the lower arm). In this example our heuristic raises the dis- placed recognition rate from 24% for a displaced accelerometer, which had 96% recognition when not displaced, to 82%.show moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Kai Kunze
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:739-opus-26114
Advisor:Paul Lukowicz
Document Type:Doctoral Thesis
Language:English
Year of Completion:2011
Date of Publication (online):2012/03/06
Publishing Institution:Universität Passau
Granting Institution:Universität Passau, Fakultät für Informatik und Mathematik
Date of final exam:2011/07/29
Release Date:2012/03/06
Tag:Aktivitätserkennung; positionsbezogener Effekte
context recognition; on-body; sensor displacement
GND Keyword:Kontextbezogenes System; Mustererkennung
Institutes:Fakultät für Informatik und Mathematik / Mitarbeiter Lehrstuhl/Einrichtung der Fakultät für Informatik und Mathematik
Dewey Decimal Classification:0 Informatik, Informationswissenschaft, allgemeine Werke / 00 Informatik, Wissen, Systeme / 004 Datenverarbeitung; Informatik
open_access (DINI-Set):open_access
Licence (German):License LogoStandardbedingung laut Einverständniserklärung