PPN: | |
Titel: | |
VerfasserIn: | |
Sprache/n: | Englisch |
Veröffentlichungsangabe: | Hamburg : HSU Univ. d. Bundeswehr, 2012 |
Umfang: | Online Ressource (582 KB, Text) : graph. Darst. |
Schriftenreihe: | |
Anmerkung: | Systemvoraussetzungen: Acrobat Reader |
Bibliogr. Zusammenhang: | |
Identifier: | URN: urn:nbn:de:gbv:705-opus-29702 Handle: 10419/71099 |
Art/Inhalt: | Arbeitspapier / Working paper / Online-Publikation / Online-publication |
Mehr zum Thema: | |
Inhalt: | In international relations, short-run incentives for non-cooperation often dominate. Yet, (external) institutions for enforcing cooperation are hampered by national sovereignty, supposedly strengthening the role of selfenforcing mechanisms. This paper examines their scope with a focus on contingent protection aka tit-for-tat in trade policy. By highlighting various strategies in a (linear) partial-equilibrium framework, we show that retaliation of noncooperative behavior by limiting market access works as a disciplining device independently of supply and demand parameters. Our theoretical results are backed by empirical evidence that countries more frequently involved in WTO-mediated disputes entailing tit-for-tat strategies pursue on average more liberal trade regimes. -- Int. Political Economy ; Trade Policy Conflicts ; Tit-for-Tat ; WTO Dispute Settlement |
|
|
| |
Lokale Schlagwörter: | |
Lokale Sachgebiete: | |
| |
Link zum Digitalisat: | |
| |
|
|
| |