Brinkmann, Sebastian, Noordman, Bo J., Hoelscher, Arnulf H., Biermann, Katharina, van Klaveren, David, Bollschweiler, Elfriede, Puetz, Katharina, van Lanschot, J. Jan B. and Drebber, Uta (2020). External Validation of Pretreatment Pathological Tumor Extent in Patients with Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Plus Surgery for Esophageal Cancer. Ann. Surg. Oncol., 27 (4). S. 1250 - 1259. NEW YORK: SPRINGER. ISSN 1534-4681

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Background This study was conducted to validate a pretreatment (i.e. prior to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy) pathological staging system in the resection specimen after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer. The study investigated the prognostic value of pretreatment pathological T and N categories (prepT and prepN categories) in both an independent and a combined patient cohort. Methods Patients with esophageal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and esophagectomy between 2012 and 2015 were included. PrepT and prepN categories were estimated based on the extent of tumor regression and regressional changes of lymph nodes in the resection specimen. The difference in Akaike's information criterion (Delta AIC) was used to assess prognostic performance. PrepN and ypN categories were combined to determine the effect of nodal sterilization on prognosis. A multivariable Cox regression model was used to identify combined prepN and ypN categories as independent prognostic factors. Results The prognostic strength of the prepT category was better than the cT and ypT categories (Delta AIC 7.7 vs. 3.0 and 2.9, respectively), and the prognostic strength of the prepN category was better than the cN category and similar to the ypN category (Delta AIC 29.2 vs. - 1.0 and 27.9, respectively). PrepN + patients who became ypN0 had significantly worse survival than prepN0 patients (2-year overall survival 69% vs. 86% in 137 patients; p = 0.044). Similar results were found in a combined cohort of 317 patients (2-year overall survival 62% vs. 85%; p = 0.002). Combined prepN/ypN stage was independently associated with overall survival. Conclusions These results independently confirm the prognostic value of prepTNM staging. PrepTNM staging is of additional prognostic value to cTNM and ypTNM. PrepN0/ypN0 patients have a better survival than prepN +/ypN0 patients.

Item Type: Journal Article
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCIDORCID Put Code
Brinkmann, SebastianUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Noordman, Bo J.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Hoelscher, Arnulf H.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Biermann, KatharinaUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
van Klaveren, DavidUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Bollschweiler, ElfriedeUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Puetz, KatharinaUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
van Lanschot, J. Jan B.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Drebber, UtaUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
URN: urn:nbn:de:hbz:38-128181
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-08024-0
Journal or Publication Title: Ann. Surg. Oncol.
Volume: 27
Number: 4
Page Range: S. 1250 - 1259
Date: 2020
Publisher: SPRINGER
Place of Publication: NEW YORK
ISSN: 1534-4681
Language: English
Faculty: Unspecified
Divisions: Unspecified
Subjects: no entry
Uncontrolled Keywords:
KeywordsLanguage
PREOPERATIVE CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND; REGRESSION; THERAPY; RADIOCHEMOTHERAPY; CHEMORADIATION; CLASSIFICATIONMultiple languages
Oncology; SurgeryMultiple languages
Refereed: Yes
URI: http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/id/eprint/12818

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Altmetric

Export

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item