Laukamp, Kai Roman, Zopfs, David ORCID: 0000-0001-9978-7453, Lennartz, Simon, Pennig, Lenhard, Maintz, David, Borggrefe, Jan ORCID: 0000-0003-2908-7560 and Hokamp, Nils Grosse (2019). Metal artifacts in patients with large dental implants and bridges: combination of metal artifact reduction algorithms and virtual monoenergetic images provides an approach to handle even strongest artifacts. Eur. Radiol., 29 (8). S. 4228 - 4239. NEW YORK: SPRINGER. ISSN 1432-1084

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

ObjectivesThis study compares reduction of strong metal artifacts from large dental implants/bridges using spectral detector CT-derived virtual monoenergetic images (VMI), metal artifact reduction algorithms/reconstructions (MAR), and a combination of both methods (VMIMAR) to conventional CT images (CI).MethodsForty-one spectral detector CT (SDCT) datasets of patients that obtained additional MAR reconstructions due to strongest artifacts from large oral implants were included. CI, VMI, MAR, and VMIMAR ranging from 70 to 200keV (10keV increment) were reconstructed. Objective image analyses were performed ROI-based by measurement of attenuation (HU) and standard deviation in most pronounced hypo-/hyperdense artifacts as well as artifact impaired soft tissue (mouth floor/soft palate). Extent of artifact reduction, diagnostic assessment of soft tissue, and appearance of new artifacts were rated visually by two radiologists.ResultsThe hypo-/hyperattenuating artifacts showed an increase and decrease of HU values in MAR and VMIMAR (CI/MAR/VMIMAR-200keV: -369.8239.6/-37.3109.6/-46.271.0 HU, p<0.001 and 274.8170.2/51.3 +/- 150.8/36.6 +/- 56.0, p<0.001, respectively). Higher keV values in hyperdense artifacts allowed for additional artifact reduction; however, this trend was not significant. Artifacts in soft tissue were reduced significantly by MAR and VMIMAR. Visually, high-keV VMI, MAR, and VMIMAR reduced artifacts and improved diagnostic assessment of soft tissue. Overcorrection/new artifacts were reported that mostly did not hamper diagnostic assessment. Overall interrater agreement was excellent (ICC=0.85).ConclusionsIn the presence of strong artifacts due to large oral implants, MAR is a powerful mean for artifact reduction. For hyperdense artifacts, MAR should be supplemented by VMI ranging from 140 to 200keV. This combination yields optimal artifact reduction and improves the diagnostic image assessment in imaging of the head and neck.

Item Type: Journal Article
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCIDORCID Put Code
Laukamp, Kai RomanUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Zopfs, DavidUNSPECIFIEDorcid.org/0000-0001-9978-7453UNSPECIFIED
Lennartz, SimonUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Pennig, LenhardUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Maintz, DavidUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Borggrefe, JanUNSPECIFIEDorcid.org/0000-0003-2908-7560UNSPECIFIED
Hokamp, Nils GrosseUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
URN: urn:nbn:de:hbz:38-134274
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5928-7
Journal or Publication Title: Eur. Radiol.
Volume: 29
Number: 8
Page Range: S. 4228 - 4239
Date: 2019
Publisher: SPRINGER
Place of Publication: NEW YORK
ISSN: 1432-1084
Language: English
Faculty: Unspecified
Divisions: Unspecified
Subjects: no entry
Uncontrolled Keywords:
KeywordsLanguage
DUAL-ENERGY CT; RECONSTRUCTION; COEFFICIENTMultiple languages
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical ImagingMultiple languages
Refereed: Yes
URI: http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/id/eprint/13427

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Altmetric

Export

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item