Kreft, Sophia, Gesierich, Anja, Eigentler, Thomas, Franklin, Cindy, Valpione, Sara, Ugurel, Selma, Utikal, Jochen, Haferkamp, Sebastian, Blank, Christian, Larkin, James ORCID: 0000-0001-5569-9523, Garbe, Claus ORCID: 0000-0001-8530-780X, Schadendorf, Dirk, Lorigan, Paul ORCID: 0000-0002-8875-2164 and Schilling, Bastian (2019). Efficacy of PD-1-based immunotherapy after radiologic progression on targeted therapy in stage IV melanoma. Eur. J. Cancer, 116. S. 207 - 216. OXFORD: ELSEVIER SCI LTD. ISSN 1879-0852

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Objectives: Targeted therapy (TT) is an effective treatment for advanced BRAFV600-mutated melanoma, but most patients eventually acquire resistance and progress. Here, we evaluated the outcome of second-line immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) after progression on dual BRAF and MEK inhibition. Methods: Patients with metastatic melanoma progressing on combined BRAF + WMEK inhibition and receiving second-line ICB between 2015 and 2019 in 9 tertiary referral centres were enrolled. Demographic and clinical data and blood counts of all patients were collected retrospectively. Results: We identified 99 patients with stage IV melanoma receiving ICB (nivolumab, pembrolizumab [n = 39] or ipilimumab plus nivolumab [n = 60]) after progression on combined TT. The median progression-free survival was similar in the PD-1 and ipilimumab plus nivolumab group (2.6 months [95% confidence interval {CI}, 2.0-3.1] vs. 2.0 [95% CI, 1.4-2.6], p = 0.15). The objective response rate was 18.0% in the PD-1 and 15.0% in the ipilimumab plus nivolumab group (p = 0.70). The disease control rate was 25.7% for monotherapy and 18.3% for combined ICB (p = 0.39). The median overall survival was 8.4 months (95% CI, 5.1-11.7) for patients receiving PD-1 monotherapy and 7.2 months (95% CI, 5.2-9.1) for patients receiving ipilimumab plus nivolumab (p = 0.86). The latter was associated with a higher rate of treatment-related adverse events (AEs). No significant association of laboratory values or clinicopathological characteristics with response to second-line ICB was observed. Conclusions: PD-1 monotherapy and combined ipilimumab plus nivolumab show similar activity and outcome in patients with melanoma resistant to BRAF + MEK inhibition. However, combined ipilimumab plus nivolumab was associated with a higher rate of treatment-related AEs compared with monotherapy. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Item Type: Journal Article
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCIDORCID Put Code
Kreft, SophiaUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Gesierich, AnjaUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Eigentler, ThomasUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Franklin, CindyUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Valpione, SaraUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Ugurel, SelmaUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Utikal, JochenUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Haferkamp, SebastianUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Blank, ChristianUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Larkin, JamesUNSPECIFIEDorcid.org/0000-0001-5569-9523UNSPECIFIED
Garbe, ClausUNSPECIFIEDorcid.org/0000-0001-8530-780XUNSPECIFIED
Schadendorf, DirkUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Lorigan, PaulUNSPECIFIEDorcid.org/0000-0002-8875-2164UNSPECIFIED
Schilling, BastianUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
URN: urn:nbn:de:hbz:38-136541
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.05.015
Journal or Publication Title: Eur. J. Cancer
Volume: 116
Page Range: S. 207 - 216
Date: 2019
Publisher: ELSEVIER SCI LTD
Place of Publication: OXFORD
ISSN: 1879-0852
Language: English
Faculty: Unspecified
Divisions: Unspecified
Subjects: no entry
Uncontrolled Keywords:
KeywordsLanguage
METASTATIC MELANOMA; COMBINED NIVOLUMAB; BRAF; IPILIMUMAB; DABRAFENIB; SURVIVAL; OUTCOMES; PEMBROLIZUMAB; TRAMETINIBMultiple languages
OncologyMultiple languages
Refereed: Yes
URI: http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/id/eprint/13654

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Altmetric

Export

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item