Pazen, David, Anagiotos, Andreas, Nuenning, Maike, Gostian, Antoniu-Oreste, Ortmann, Magdalene and Beutner, Dirk (2017). The Impact of a Cochlear Implant Electrode Array on the Middle Ear Transfer Function. Ear Hear., 38 (4). S. E241 - 15. PHILADELPHIA: LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS. ISSN 1538-4667

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Objectives: As a treatment for partial deafness with residual hearing in the lower frequency range, the combined acoustic and electric stimulation of the cochlea has become widespread. Acoustic stimulation is provided by a hearing aid's airborne sound and the electric stimulation by a cochlear implant electrode array, which may be inserted through the round window or a cochleostomy. To take advantage of that concept, it is essential to preserve residual hearing after surgery. Therefore, the intracochlear electrode array should not compromise the middle ear vibration transmission. This study investigates the influence of different electrode types and insertion paths on the middle ear transfer function and the inner ear fluid dynamics. Design: Sound-induced oval and round window net volume velocities were calculated from vibration measurements with laser vibrometers on six nonfixated human temporal bones. After baseline measurements in the natural condition, a cochleostomy was drilled and close(d) with connective tissue. Then, four different electrode arrays were inserted through the cochleostomy. Afterwards, they were inserted through the round window while the cochleostomy was patched again with connective tissue. Results: After having drilled a cochleostomy and electrode insertion, no systematic trends in the changes of oval and round window volume velocities were observed. Nearly all changes of middle ear transfer functions, as well as oval and round window volume velocity ratios, were statistically insignificant. Conclusions: Intracochlear electrode arrays do not significantly increase cochlear input impedance immediately after insertion. Any changes that may occur seem to be independent of electrode array type and insertion path.

Item Type: Journal Article
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCIDORCID Put Code
Pazen, DavidUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Anagiotos, AndreasUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Nuenning, MaikeUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Gostian, Antoniu-OresteUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Ortmann, MagdaleneUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Beutner, DirkUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
URN: urn:nbn:de:hbz:38-226204
DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000407
Journal or Publication Title: Ear Hear.
Volume: 38
Number: 4
Page Range: S. E241 - 15
Date: 2017
Publisher: LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
Place of Publication: PHILADELPHIA
ISSN: 1538-4667
Language: English
Faculty: Unspecified
Divisions: Unspecified
Subjects: no entry
Uncontrolled Keywords:
KeywordsLanguage
BONE-CONDUCTION STIMULATION; COMPLEX STAPES MOTION; ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; RESIDUAL HEARING; AUDITORY-SYSTEM; INNER-EAR; TISSUE FORMATION; CLINICAL-TRIAL; PRESERVATION; AIRMultiple languages
Audiology & Speech-Language Pathology; OtorhinolaryngologyMultiple languages
Refereed: Yes
URI: http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/id/eprint/22620

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Altmetric

Export

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item