Mueller, Dolores T., Babic, Benjamin, Herbst, Veronika, Gebauer, Florian ORCID: 0000-0001-5312-4814, Schloesser, Hans, Schiffmann, Lars, Chon, Seung-Hun ORCID: 0000-0002-8923-6428, Schroeder, Wolfgang, Bruns, Christiane J. and Fuchs, Hans F. (2020). Does Circular Stapler Size in Surgical Management of Esophageal Cancer Affect Anastomotic Leak Rate? 4-Year Experience of a European High-Volume Center. Cancers, 12 (11). BASEL: MDPI. ISSN 2072-6694

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Simple Summary One of the most severe postoperative complications after a transthoracic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer is a leakage of the anastomosis created between the remnant esophagus and the stomach. There is substantial debate on which surgical technique and which stapler are the best. The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze whether the stapler diameter had an impact on postoperative anastomotic leak rates during a 4-year time frame from 2016 to 2020. A total of 632 patients (open, hybrid, and totally minimally invasive esophagectomy) met the inclusion criteria. A total of 214 patients underwent an anastomosis with a 25 mm stapler vs. 418 patients with a 28 mm stapler. Anastomotic leak rates were 15.4% vs. 10.8%, respectively. Stapler size should be chosen according to the individual anatomical situation of the patient and may be of higher relevance in patients undergoing totally minimally invasive reconstruction. Anastomotic leak is one of the most severe postoperative complications and is therefore considered a benchmark for the quality of surgery for esophageal cancer. There is substantial debate on which anastomotic technique is the best for patients undergoing Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Our standardized technique is a circular stapled anastomosis with either a 25 or 28 mm anvil. The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze whether the stapler diameter had an impact on postoperative anastomotic leak rates during a 4-year time frame from 2016 to 2020. A total of 632 patients (open, hybrid, and totally minimally invasive esophagectomy) met the inclusion criteria. A total of 214 patients underwent an anastomosis with a 25 mm stapler vs. 418 patients with a 28 mm stapler. Anastomotic leak rates were 15.4% vs. 10.8%, respectively (p = 0.0925). Stapler size should be chosen according to the individual anatomical situation of the patient. Stapler size may be of higher relevance in patients undergoing totally minimally invasive reconstruction.

Item Type: Journal Article
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCIDORCID Put Code
Mueller, Dolores T.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Babic, BenjaminUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Herbst, VeronikaUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Gebauer, FlorianUNSPECIFIEDorcid.org/0000-0001-5312-4814UNSPECIFIED
Schloesser, HansUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Schiffmann, LarsUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Chon, Seung-HunUNSPECIFIEDorcid.org/0000-0002-8923-6428UNSPECIFIED
Schroeder, WolfgangUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Bruns, Christiane J.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Fuchs, Hans F.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
URN: urn:nbn:de:hbz:38-313174
DOI: 10.3390/cancers12113474
Journal or Publication Title: Cancers
Volume: 12
Number: 11
Date: 2020
Publisher: MDPI
Place of Publication: BASEL
ISSN: 2072-6694
Language: English
Faculty: Unspecified
Divisions: Unspecified
Subjects: no entry
Uncontrolled Keywords:
KeywordsLanguage
COMPLICATIONS; DIAGNOSISMultiple languages
OncologyMultiple languages
URI: http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/id/eprint/31317

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Altmetric

Export

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item