Universität zu Köln

Mueller, Birgit, Schulze, Jule, Kreuer, David ORCID: 0000-0002-9941-8970, Linstaedter, Anja and Frank, Karin ORCID: 0000-0002-2769-0692 (2015). How to avoid unsustainable side effects of managing climate risk in drylands - The supplementary feeding controversy. Agric. Syst., 139. S. 153 - 166. OXFORD: ELSEVIER SCI LTD. ISSN 1873-2267

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

The increase in climate risk is of great concern in diylands. Providing livestock with supplementary fodder has become a widely used strategy for coping with this risk. However, its application is controversial. On the one hand, this form of supplementation allows smallholders to avoid a breakdown in animal numbers in times of drought. On the other hand, it keeps herd sizes high and may thus result in rangeland degradation in the long term. This study aims to tackle the question: can supplementary feeding strategies be designed in such a way that they help to reduce livestock asset risk, but avoid or at least reduce unsustainable side effects on pastures? We constructed a stylized ecological-economic simulation model parameterized to a Moroccan case study which incorporates feedbacks between management and vegetation-livestock dynamics under stochastic rainfall. Three supplementation strategies are compared. Furthermore, the impact of socio-economic and climatic change processes, such as price increases for supplementary fodder or rising fluctuations in rainfall, is investigated. Our results show that the conventional supplementation strategy, which supplements in years of forage shortage, reduces livestock asset risk in the short term. However, it can lead to lower pasture productivity and lower yields from pastoralism in the long run. In contrast, a hypothetical strategy which additionally supplements in the year after a drought in order to rest the pasture reduces livestock asset risk and maintains pastures in a better condition without increasing the amount of supplementation. On the methodological level, this study shows the potential of ecological-economic models to assess new management strategies under different processes of global change. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Creators:	Creators Email ORCID ORCID Put Code Mueller, Birgit UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED Schulze, Jule UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED Kreuer, David UNSPECIFIED orcid.org/0000-0002-9941-8970 UNSPECIFIED Linstaedter, Anja UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED Frank, Karin UNSPECIFIED orcid.org/0000-0002-2769-0692 UNSPECIFIED
URN:	urn:nbn:de:hbz:38-391619
DOI:	10.1016/j.agsy.2015.07.001
Journal or Publication Title:	Agric. Syst.
Volume:	139
Page Range:	S. 153 - 166
Date:	2015
Publisher:	ELSEVIER SCI LTD
Place of Publication:	OXFORD
ISSN:	1873-2267
Language:	English
Faculty:	Unspecified
Divisions:	Unspecified
Subjects:	no entry
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Keywords Language SEMIARID GRAZING SYSTEMS; LIVESTOCK SYSTEMS; LAND-USE; NONEQUILIBRIUM CONCEPTS; VEGETATION CHANGE; ANIMAL PRODUCTION; FOOD SECURITY; RANGELANDS; AFRICA; SUSTAINABILITY Multiple languages Agriculture, Multidisciplinary Multiple languages
URI:	http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/id/eprint/39161