Pontes, Halley M. ORCID: 0000-0001-8020-7623, Schivinski, Bruno ORCID: 0000-0002-4095-1922, Sindermann, Cornelia ORCID: 0000-0003-1064-8866, Li, Mei, Becker, Benjamin, Zhou, Min and Montag, Christian ORCID: 0000-0001-8112-0837 (2021). Measurement and Conceptualization of Gaming Disorder According to the World Health Organization Framework: the Development of the Gaming Disorder Test. Int. J. Mental Health Addict., 19 (2). S. 508 - 529. NEW YORK: SPRINGER. ISSN 1557-1882

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Previous research on gaming disorder (GD) has highlighted key methodological and conceptual hindrances stemming from the heterogeneity of nomenclature and the use of non-standardized psychometric tools to assess this phenomenon. The recent recognition of GD as an official mental health disorder and behavioral addiction by the World Health Organization (WHO) in the 11th Revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) opens up new possibilities to investigate further the psychosocial and mental health implications due to excessive and disordered gaming. However, before further research on GD can be conducted in a reliable way and within a robust cross-cultural context, a valid and reliable standardized psychometric tool to assess the construct as defined by the WHO should be developed. The aim of this study was to develop The Gaming Disorder Test (GDT), a brief four-item measure to assess GD and to further explore its psychometric properties. A sample of 236 Chinese (47% male, mean age 19.22 years, SD = 1.57) and 324 British (49.4% male, mean age 26.74 years, SD = 7.88) gamers was recruited online. Construct validity of the GDT was examined via factorial validity, nomological validity, alongside convergent and discriminant validity. Concurrent validity was also examined using the Internet Gaming Disorder Scale-Short-Form (IGDS9-SF). Finally, reliability indicators involving the Cronbach's alpha and composite reliability coefficients were estimated. Overall, the results indicated that GDT is best conceptualized within a single-factor structure. Additionally, the four items of the GDT are valid, reliable, and proved to be highly suitable for measuring GD within a cross-cultural context.

Item Type: Journal Article
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCIDORCID Put Code
Pontes, Halley M.UNSPECIFIEDorcid.org/0000-0001-8020-7623UNSPECIFIED
Schivinski, BrunoUNSPECIFIEDorcid.org/0000-0002-4095-1922UNSPECIFIED
Sindermann, CorneliaUNSPECIFIEDorcid.org/0000-0003-1064-8866UNSPECIFIED
Li, MeiUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Becker, BenjaminUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Zhou, MinUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Montag, ChristianUNSPECIFIEDorcid.org/0000-0001-8112-0837UNSPECIFIED
URN: urn:nbn:de:hbz:38-595553
DOI: 10.1007/s11469-019-00088-z
Journal or Publication Title: Int. J. Mental Health Addict.
Volume: 19
Number: 2
Page Range: S. 508 - 529
Date: 2021
Publisher: SPRINGER
Place of Publication: NEW YORK
ISSN: 1557-1882
Language: English
Faculty: Unspecified
Divisions: Unspecified
Subjects: no entry
Uncontrolled Keywords:
KeywordsLanguage
FIT INDEXES; INTERNET; VALIDATION; SCALE; CRITERIA; SPANISH; ADOLESCENTS; LONELINESS; ADAPTATION; DEPRESSIONMultiple languages
Psychology, Clinical; Substance Abuse; PsychiatryMultiple languages
URI: http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/id/eprint/59555

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Altmetric

Export

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item