(Net)working a Stone into a Tool. How Technologiesof Serial Visualization, Arrangement, and NarrationStabilized Eoliths as Archeological Objects
Files
Authors
Department
Loading...
Abstract
Dieser Beitrag setzt sich mit den historischen Kontroversen um die sogenannten Eolithen auseinander: Waren diese sehr rudimentär abgeschlagenen Steine aus europäischen Tertiärschichten tatsächlich das Resultat menschlicher Arbeit? Der Fokus ist auf die narrativen, visuellen und räumlichen Argumente einiger Eolithen-Verfechter gerichtet. Eine wirkmächtige Strategie war die Integration der vermeintlichen Werkzeuge in geologische, archäologische und paläoanthropologische Serien, um damit an etabliertes Wissen und an die kulturelle Bedeutung des Seriellen anzuschließen. Zuvor mussten die Feuersteine jedoch in Transkriptionskaskaden von Objekten in situ in Zeichnungen und serielle Abbildungen in Publikationen übersetzt werden, um schließlich den Abstraktionsgrad von Elementen in hoch formalisierten Tabellen einander gegenübergestellter Serien zu erreichen. In meiner Diskussion nehme ich diese Aspekte der Wissensgenerierung im Transit zwischen unterschiedlichen Gemeinschaten, Räumen und Medien ins Visier.
This paper deals with issues surrounding so-called eoliths in the nineteenth and early twentieth century: Were these very crudely chipped stones from European Tertiary deposits really human-made? The focus is on the visual, spatial, and narrative arguments used by some of the eoliths-proponents. One powerful strategy consisted in integrating the supposed tools into existing geological, archeological, and paleoanthropological series, relying on established scientific knowledge and the wider cultural significance of the serial. However, the flints first had to be translated in cascades of inscriptions from actual stones in situ into drawings and series of drawings in publications to eventually gain a high level of abstraction as elements in formalized tables of juxtaposed series. My discussion of the eoliths focuses on these aspects in the production of knowledge in transit between communities, spaces, and media.
This paper deals with issues surrounding so-called eoliths in the nineteenth and early twentieth century: Were these very crudely chipped stones from European Tertiary deposits really human-made? The focus is on the visual, spatial, and narrative arguments used by some of the eoliths-proponents. One powerful strategy consisted in integrating the supposed tools into existing geological, archeological, and paleoanthropological series, relying on established scientific knowledge and the wider cultural significance of the serial. However, the flints first had to be translated in cascades of inscriptions from actual stones in situ into drawings and series of drawings in publications to eventually gain a high level of abstraction as elements in formalized tables of juxtaposed series. My discussion of the eoliths focuses on these aspects in the production of knowledge in transit between communities, spaces, and media.
Description
Keywords
Visualisierung, Evolution des Menschen, Geschichte der Archäologie, Geschichte der Paläoanthropologie, Wissenszirkulation, Eolithen, Serialisierung, visualization, History of archeology, history of paleoanthropology, knowledge circulation, eoliths, human evolution, serialization
Dewey Decimal Classification
930 Geschichte des Altertums bis ca. 499
Citation
Sommer, M. (2015). (Net)working a Stone into a Tool. How Technologiesof Serial Visualization, Arrangement, and NarrationStabilized Eoliths as Archeological Objects. Historiographical Approaches to Past Archaeological Research. 15-45. https://doi.org/10.18452/5288