Hegemonialmächte im Vorderen und Mittleren Orient : die Dritte Partei in internationalen Konflikten

Hegemons in the Near and Middle East : the Third Party in International Conflicts

  • During the last five decades hegemons played an important role in de-escalating international conflicts in the subregion defined as the core of Oriens Islamicus. Statistical analysis of large datasets shows that half of all conflicts remained without any interference from the hegemonial powers at all - both on global scale and in the subregion. In all other cases however, hegemons (especially super-powers in the role of patrons) tended more often to act as (power-) mediators when their client-state was engaged in conflict with a client of the opposing superpower in Oriens Islamicus than they did on global scale. They did this in their own interest in order to avoid direct involvement, i.e. possible danger of a nuclear escalation. In contrast to conventional mediation theory they were more effective in conflict de-escalation than other mediators, especially in conflicts between Israel and its Arab neighbours. The end of bipolarity in the international system also brought this mechanism of de-escalation to an end. It leaves theDuring the last five decades hegemons played an important role in de-escalating international conflicts in the subregion defined as the core of Oriens Islamicus. Statistical analysis of large datasets shows that half of all conflicts remained without any interference from the hegemonial powers at all - both on global scale and in the subregion. In all other cases however, hegemons (especially super-powers in the role of patrons) tended more often to act as (power-) mediators when their client-state was engaged in conflict with a client of the opposing superpower in Oriens Islamicus than they did on global scale. They did this in their own interest in order to avoid direct involvement, i.e. possible danger of a nuclear escalation. In contrast to conventional mediation theory they were more effective in conflict de-escalation than other mediators, especially in conflicts between Israel and its Arab neighbours. The end of bipolarity in the international system also brought this mechanism of de-escalation to an end. It leaves the hegemon(s) as a potentially powerful third party on the one hand, but on the other their inclination to become involved in regional conflict remains rather diminished as long as the basic national interests in the area are not at stake.show moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Additional Services

Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author details:Bernhard J. Trautner
URN:urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-7998
Publication type:Postprint
Language:German
Publication year:1997
Publishing institution:Universität Potsdam
Release date:2006/08/09
Source:WeltTrends : Zeitschrift für internationale Politik und vergleichende Studien. - 16 (1997). - S. 7 - 42
RVK - Regensburg classification:MA 8157
Organizational units:Extern / Extern
DDC classification:3 Sozialwissenschaften / 32 Politikwissenschaft / 320 Politikwissenschaft
Collection(s):Universität Potsdam / Zeitschriften / WeltTrends : Zeitschrift für internationale Politik, ISSN 0944-8101 / Naher Osten - Region im Wandel? 16 (1997)
External remark:erschienen in: WeltTrends : Zeitschrift für internationale Politik und vergleichende Studien. - 16 (1997)
WeltTrends erscheint im Universitätsverlag Potsdam
Abowünsche und Bestellungen von Einzelheften bitte per Mail an den Universitätsverlag: ubpub@rz.uni-potsdam.de
Einzelheft: 12,00 € (ermäßigt: 5,00 €)
Jahresabo: 40,00 € (ermäßigt: 25,00 €)
Accept ✔
This website uses technically necessary session cookies. By continuing to use the website, you agree to this. You can find our privacy policy here.