The International Law Commission and Community Interests

  • The paper looks at community interests in international law from the perspective of the International Law Commission. As the topics of the Commission are diverse, the outcome of its work is often seen as providing a sense of direction regarding general aspects of international law. After defining what he understands by “community interests”, the author looks at both secondary and primary rules of international law, as they have been articulated by the Commission, as well as their relevance for the recognition and implementation of community interests. The picture which emerges only partly fits the widespread narrative of “from self-interest to community interest”. Whereas the Commission has recognized, or developed, certain primary rules which more fully articulate community interests, it has been reluctant to reformulate secondary rules of international law, with the exception of jus cogens. The Commission has more recently rather insisted that the traditional State-consent-oriented secondary rules concerning the formation ofThe paper looks at community interests in international law from the perspective of the International Law Commission. As the topics of the Commission are diverse, the outcome of its work is often seen as providing a sense of direction regarding general aspects of international law. After defining what he understands by “community interests”, the author looks at both secondary and primary rules of international law, as they have been articulated by the Commission, as well as their relevance for the recognition and implementation of community interests. The picture which emerges only partly fits the widespread narrative of “from self-interest to community interest”. Whereas the Commission has recognized, or developed, certain primary rules which more fully articulate community interests, it has been reluctant to reformulate secondary rules of international law, with the exception of jus cogens. The Commission has more recently rather insisted that the traditional State-consent-oriented secondary rules concerning the formation of customary international law and regarding the interpretation of treaties continue to be valid in the face of other actors and forms of action which push towards the recognition of more and thicker community interests.show moreshow less

Download full text files

  • SHA-1:def28293fb36755457f632d43f1edfce6b5cbc3f

Export metadata

Additional Services

Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author details:Georg NolteGND
URN:urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-421875
DOI:https://doi.org/10.25932/publishup-42187
ISSN:2509-3770
ISSN:2509-3762
Title of parent work (English):KFG Working Paper Series
Publication series (Volume number):KFG Working Paper Series (7)
Publication type:Working Paper
Language:English
Date of first publication:2018/03/13
Publication year:2017
Publishing institution:Universität Potsdam
Release date:2019/01/03
Issue:7
Number of pages:22
Source:First publication of the paper: DOI https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3136943
RVK - Regensburg classification:PR 2410, PR 2411
Organizational units:Extern / Berlin Potsdam Research Group "The International Rule of Law - Rise or Decline?"
DDC classification:3 Sozialwissenschaften / 34 Recht / 340 Recht
Peer review:Nicht referiert
License (German):License LogoKeine öffentliche Lizenz: Unter Urheberrechtsschutz
Accept ✔
This website uses technically necessary session cookies. By continuing to use the website, you agree to this. You can find our privacy policy here.